mike_mahoney
-
Posts
87 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by mike_mahoney
-
-
PhotoNet is not all that bad, but it is down from time to time, and
it�s not the easiest site to move around in. It would be a
consideration if were are unable to maintain the site as is, or with
some changes as to fees or funding if required.
<p>
Deans' point about critical mass is a good one. Usefilm.com is a good
site among many good sites - and all photography sites are constantly
looking to increase their traffic/memberships. Altafs� offer is kind,
but I�m sure we would be welcomed at other sites as well - the
important thing here is to maintain our critical mass, and to try to
continue with the forum in it�s current form, or as close as possible
-
I'd agree with the previous post - wait until you're wishing you had
a wider lens or longer lens for specific applications. I often needed
a wider lens for exteriors, and certainly for interiors while using a
90, so my next lens will probably be a 72.
The next "logical step" for you will probably be different, depends
on your requirements and work. Wait until you find yourself saying "
If only I had an XXmm I could make this shot" a few times, then start
to shop.
-
The Lowepro bags ARE very good, and the harness system on the larger
bags make them seem almost weightless, which is a good thing, as a
Phototrekker AW is around 7lbs. The only complaint I have about the
bags is the way you need to put the bottom of the bag on the ground
to get full access to the inside - that same bottom is next to your
back when carrying, and picks up moisture and dirt, which of course
ends up on your back as well.
<p>
But I've used a Lowepro AW Phototrekker for the past three years, and
it's the best I've found for larger kits.
-
Sal, there is a LF forum on photo.net, but the link I posted is not
valid, it must be one of those addresses that changes with each post.
Try going to the main Photo.net page, then "community", "discussion
forums", "general photography", then scroll down the page to the
large format section. I'll try the link again, but if it's no good,
just follow the above.
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-one-category?
topic_id=23&category=Large%20Format
-
A LF forum already exists on photo.net, I'd guess any arrangement
with them may involve uniting the two forums, check here to see
content:
<p>
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-one-category?
topic_id=23&category=Large%20Format
-
As I type this reply, photo.net is down, a not uncommon occurance.
I'd like to see this forum continue in its current commercial free,
informative and mature style. Moving to a hosting service such as
Yahoo or Photo.net will necessarily threaten these qualities, but if
the first alternative is not too much work it would be my preference.
-
Agree with the above Arca answer. Discovery set up in the field is
simply taking out of bag, placing on tripod and focusing.
-
Boy, some of you guys work quick - 100+ shots per day!!!
<p>
Jennifer, your Discovery can be broken down to a failry small size,
as you probably already know. Should be able to fit into a smaller
backpack, so why not carry on? You remove two of travels' biggest
questions - will my luggage arrive with me?, and if so - will it be
in one piece?
<p>
You didn't mention the whole size of your kit in terms of lenses,
meters, etc., so maybe it's really NOT possible, but I'd try it
first.
-
Andy, this question appears from time to time, and the above-
mentioned McGrath book seems to get the most votes each time.
-
Thanks for the responses, I really appreciate the information - as a
point of clarification, I had contacted them over a period of eight
to nine months after the initial samples, thus moving the time period
from my last contact with them to the actual use of the image to be
about sixteen months. Also, although my contact person is no longer
with the firm, at least one other senior person was aware of my
initial agreement with them, although not directly involved. My gut
tells me they are trying to get something for nothing, and it's not a
simple clerical error or not knowing where the image originated.
<p>
I've decided to invoice them for the image, with a covering letter
outlining copyright, asking for the return of the other samples, and
state no further use of any images without prior arrangement. If I
don't receive payment in 90 days it's off to the lawyers. Some of you
may see me as softhearted, but I'd still like to give them a chance
to pay up before going legal.
72,75 lens coverage
in Large Format
Posted