Jump to content

stephen_jones4

Members
  • Posts

    651
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by stephen_jones4

  1. On a previous thread, a 5x zeiss loupe was mentioned which

    allegedly gave superior eye relief to the leica offering. Does

    anyone know where I can purchase one? Preferably in the UK?

    Do I have to move to New York to get access these interesting

    bits and pieces...?!

  2. I think you're right - if sharpness is your prime consideration,

    there isn't much to choose between a Nikkor at f8 and a leica

    lens at f8 (at least for a large proportion of the fixed lenses).

    There is a big difference in sharpness at wide apertures

    however (although maybe that's what you've got m's for?!) and

    there is a huge difference in tonality and the way the lenses

    perform in difficult light conditions (I know this from shooting

    natural light dance/ballet photographs with both systems). The

    only caveat is in the case of zooms - the f4 zooms, although

    apparantly very sharp, do not seem to me to have the same

    tonality as the primes/f2.8 zooms. In other words, my advice

    would be that if you're really going to stick to the lenses you

    mention go with R but if you're going to be seduced by zooms

    maybe think again. BTW, although the 24 2.8 is considered a

    relatively weak R lens, and the 242.8 afd a relatively strong

    performer, having used the one and owned the other, I would

    still say the R is far superior, especially if tonality and not just

    sharpness are important to you. Finally, and for what it's worth, I

    always felt the 35 1.4ais lens to be one of the very best of the

    nikkors - I 've never used the f2 and even more finally, the 902.8's

    are ALL wonderful - I used to own the old(est) 5 element version

    and it made mincemeat of the 105 2.5 ais I owned (which

    nikonians reckon to be one of their all time finest)

  3. Please please forgive me if this is old news...After Lutz K's

    advice re: using a cable tie, I have found that the plastic strap tie

    for attaching a bicycle pump to a bike frame works as an

    excellent upgrade. The things come in packs of 2 and have a

    convenient "nipple" (that would attach to the pump) which gives

    excellent purchase for focussing and can even be filed down into

    the ergonomic shape of the real tabs. Because you tighten them

    up with a screwdriver you can take them on and off if you wish (I

    should counsel against tightening them too tight in case you

    damage anything!). Zefal (a french (?)cycle manufacturer) do an

    XL one which is big enough to accomodate my 90f2apo

    although so far I have been defeated as far as the 751.4 is

    concerned. In any case it has made a huge difference to my use

    of the 90 and I would like to think that it might give others equal

    delight.

  4. Having just bought a beautiful new Mac, I am hoping to begin

    using it to scan and print images taken with my leica m6's. I

    wonder what scanner/printers people would recommend.

    Specifically, the Piezography prints I have seen seem to be

    genuinely "photographic" in their quality (although this system

    has only just begun to make it over here to the UK and seems

    quite a hassle to set up.) but much of the sample output from

    e.g. Epson 1290 printers seems garish and fake in terms of its

    colours even if the resolution is impressive. I have only just

    "sealed" the tomb that was my darkroom and I'm beginning to

    wonder if I'll ever get the lovely results that my Rodagon

    enlarging lens gave me. There seems to be very little information

    to be gleaned over here (in Brighton, England) so any comments

    would be very much appreciated.

×
×
  • Create New...