<p>I know this question has been asked over the years, and though a few people insist that some generic ink works just fine (in some printers), the overwhelming answer is that the generics make poor photographic prints, and worse, clog the print head.<br /><br /> No one wants to damage their printer, but the inkjet ink is the number one cost of printing - so we'd all love to get better prices on ink. I'm wondering if there is finally someone selling generic ink that is "just as good as" or "almost as good as" Canon inkjet inks. [Maybe someone knows the real manufacturer of Canon inks, and maybe THEY are available with a generic label?]<br /><br /> I suspect the answer is still "Canon is best", but honestly, I send photos out to a lab for prints - I don't print photos at home. So, I don't really need the same archival quality, perfect colors, or ultra-sharp quality.<br /><br /> In my home office, I have a Canon MP7120 (replacing a Canon iP6700D.) It is used mostly for everyday printing tasks, and occasionally, I'll print some of my photos as greeting cards. When I do, I rarely use glossy photo paper. Usually I use "GreenPix" recycled card stock from Red River Paper (I mention this because it may help to know what I expect the inks to look good on - http://www.redrivercatalog.com/cardshop/scored/greenpix.htm)<br /><br /> Again, I have no desire to save money - even if the savings are huge - if the ink will clog the print head. But I'm hoping that by now, in 2015, that someone will have either figured out the generic labeled ink from the same manufacturer that Canon uses (assuming it exists), or maybe knows of a high quality generic that can save some money compared to Canon's very high-priced inks.<br /><br />Thanks,<br /><br />Dennis</p>