Jump to content

theover

Members
  • Posts

    139
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by theover

  1. No, it was the books or rather the subject, not home.

     

    Well, the amp is 2x100W RMS cont. (about 500W peak) DC coupled, 0.005% harm. distortion at 50W.

     

    The DSP has a blackfin EZ-LITE 533 board inside, and a Xilinx Coolrunner demo board for IO and some other jobs. On that board there are 4 20bits 96 kHz inputs and 6x24 bits (IIRC) at least 96kS/s output, and video output, while the DSP runs at 600MHz. It currently (amoung other things) runs a chorus DSP program I made, see here.

     

    http://82.168.209.239/Diary/Ldi19/HPIM0769b1m.JPG

    Holy

          9

    Is that Toul or could that be Tours? I've been to the latter and there was a cathedral similar to this I think, and the associations are, like in general, not exactly holy and nice, these buildings were often built by oppressed people, and certainly the mideval churches were serving the catholic establishment which made the middle ages called 'dark'...

     

    It's a nice effect, the bright edges, but the sort of impressive threatening of the building remains in the picture.

  2. Well, in fact harddisc stored images could last many decades, when treated right, as can certain CD's, and before they fade, they can be mostly perfectly copied time and time again, so this might be a bit volatile technology, but the bits *can* be there to stay! I agree (seeing the picture again) that jpg has gotten to the 100k limit once more, and of course the picture isn't a glossy one, but I disagree with the idea that eastetics are out, and in fact this is an interesting subject, especially in the context of a photonet comment where ALL pictures are digital and seen on usually a far from perfect display, which is how such limitations can be met, and, preferably also *without* the obligate 'fashyness' of lets say small web page pictures or, framkly, the just as obligate impossed glossyness of most of the photonet high ranking pictures. On 2 different screens I tried it on the picture has an interesting feel to it, and it wasn't just a snapshot (though did certainly not take hours..).

     

    Some pictures of the week seem to underline my point, which of course isn't that dodgy pictures ought to make a new grunge run the fashion in photography.

     

    In fact, some pictures I made more recently (with a HP 5 megapixel digicam) can compete with many 'analog' pictures, and in more than one sense probably the fidelity of the digican is higher than corrosion processes of traditional photography. The trying out of 'analog' saturation and bleeding techniques and camera effects is of course also interesting in the digital domain, and of course most cheap digtital cams are no alternative to that. But they are cheap and easy, and don't require chemical processing.

    Joe Lovano

          1

    Taken at Northsea Jazz in the Hague, one of the medium sized halls.

     

    Played with J. Scofield, that´s how I knew about him, recently even

    teamed up with Michael Brecker in Amsterdam Concert Hall. I might put

    up a little video on my homepage from that in a while.

  3. Given some of pictures I know the countryside they are from very well of, and of which the colours were dreadfully wrong in suggestion (more than maybe technics), I didn't get the 'river kway' impression we all know from this image, so I thought I'd see if the material does hold that impression somehow. I discovered the background are trees, too (not just burnt sky), and came up with this. Of course I threw all the materials away afterward, it was just a comment, I wouldn't want to go against copyright.

    1352179.jpg
  4. Well, when I pick such an image and with this content, yup, it it art, regardless of the ratings here, they are commonly for photographers which want to see a certain flashiness or limited interest, usually...

     

    Cutting the crap, I don't remember me signifying it was in the category sense 'art', but maybe I left some tick somewhere or menu signify it should be regarded as such, for which I then apologize, it wasn't the specific intent to address art picture audience.

     

    The absense of infrared is not intentional, but boosting the spectrum preference to one end or another I didn't do on purpose, I found the image sort of quite ok as it is, as I wrote, I also didn't for instance spread intensity values over the available intensity domain, it didn't look right anymore when I did.

     

    I looked at at least two different screens, and the droopyness (I think it rained) and general idea of the suspended generator are caught fine IMO.

  5. A composition based on the original centre picture from an exhibition

    at Centre Pompidou in paris, about half a year ago.

     

    All other elements are from photos of mine, some manipulated. The idea

    was to make a sort of pretty picture, evidently containing suggestions

    and meaning.

     

    Technically, the added spot lights, and the general near impossibility

    to merge pictures with complexity and where lighting is relevant is a

    subject.

×
×
  • Create New...