![](http://content.invisioncic.com/l323473/set_resources_2/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
tim_franklin
-
Posts
377 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by tim_franklin
-
-
I shot this picture earlier this summer during a visit to Lacock
Abbey (where Fox Talbot discovered the pos/neg process). I
used my M6 and 50 'cron with Agfa Scala rated at 200. Another
couple of shots are in a roll under my name.<p><img
src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=103
5373&size=md">
-
How about this version?<p><center><img
src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=102
6869&size=md"></center>
-
Thanks both so far.
Carl - I appreciate what you say, and will look out for a more in
depth comment if you get the time. The sharpness issue is one
that bugs me; the original slides are sharp (and contrasty, the
first shot was a hard one to scan!) but my lack of
scanning/post-scanning skills seem to let me down. I'm always
admiring other people's pictures here and elsewhere, and
thinking why the hell can't I get sharp results like that.
-
Whoops! Forgot to say that all were shot with M3 and 50 'cron on
Velvia rated 40.
-
I just finished posting a folder of pictures taken at Chatham
Historic Dockyard in Kent, UK. See it <a
href="http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=240212">
here</a>. Any comments would be most welcome, especially
constructive criticism. Thanks in advance.<p>Perhaps my
favourite is this one<br><center><img
src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=102
5691&size=md"></center>
-
Here's a translated version<p><i>Leica R9
To love on second click
Six years after the conception of the Leica R8 the Leica R9,
which is not only easier than their Vorgaengerin, comes but also
with many detail improvements and new functions offers to
photokina 2002.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
With the introduction of the Leica R9 and the conception of three
new Leica r-objectives the Leica Camera AG shows its unbroken
commitment in the mirror reflex range. One of the pluses of the
new model is the weight smaller to the R8 100 gram, which was
reached by the employment by new materials such as
magnesium. Its love for the Leica R9 will discover the
photographer, if it learns the practical improvements of the
camera to know. To it the comfortable operation of all setters
without for it the camera from the eye belongs to to take for
example. The High Eyepoint Sucher supplies a clear to press
bright sucherbild also without the eye to the eyecup and supplies
with so also to eyeglass wearers a comfortable suchereinblick.
Owing to the integrated diopter reconciliation from -2 to +2 in half
stages the focusing can take place depending upon preference
with or without eyeglasses. All data such as time, screen, mode
of operation, exposure measuring method or the film
speedometer, relevant for the admission, can be read off clearly
arranged in the Sucher. As soon as the camera is switched on
and the trip is touched lightly, the lit information center shows all
important camera focusing on the camera rear wall like the
number of exposed photographs, the sensitivity of the used film,
the made exposure corrections and the battery condition. </i>
-
Yeah, saw the dynamic trio in that pack shot you posted here a
while ago Steve.
If there aren't any takers I may well keep the M4 after all - I only
put it up as I'm in the process of buying a black M2 (after its had
a thorough CLA), and could have done with the spare cash to
avoid a savings raid!
-
The camera referred to above <b>is</b> actually on the
Cameraquest list, but <b>not</b> in the various books I have. In
any case, I would refer people to this quote from Stephen
Gandy's excellent site<p><i>Of special note are the rare and
expensive black paint bodies and military M's. While the list is
probably as accurate as we are going to have, it has long been
accepted by Leica collectors that some real black bodies are
"not on the list."</i>
-
Was the guy Shintaro? I dunno��I never met him. I was told
he'd been using the camera for 30 odd years, and that's about all
I know.
Anyway, check this <a
href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=138
1354556"> auction</a> for a black M2 (serial 1075xxx). Same
deal here - seller claims <i>original finish</i>, but the serials
don't match up.
-
Steve,<br>
I am saying that the finish is of such a high standard that I
believe it to be a factory original <i>regardless</i> of serial
number. Judging by the converted M2-R referred to above, 3rd
party repaintings are "heavy" in terms of the finish of the paint
(hope that is understandable)<p>Whilst I fully agree that the
published information on serials and other matters must guide
us, I do not believe it should be treated as Holy Writ. I would very
much like to confirm this one way or the other, but suspect that
even if Leica had such detailed information to hand, it would take
very many months to find it. Perhaps the only ways would be (i) to
ask the previous owner, but I understand he is a Japanese
gentleman, or (ii) submit the camera to a real expert to get a
judgement on whether the finish is "genuine" or an aftermarket
addition.<p>At some point the camera has been serviced or
repaired by Boulder Camera Repair (not a company I'm familiar
with - maybe some US forum readers are?). There is a sticker
on the underside of the shutter crate (on the loading diagram)
with the number 1-23-80 (a date probably) followed by 2779 or
2774 which I hope is a repair log number. If it still exists, this
might identify the appearance of this camera at that time.
-
Hi Eliot.<br>
Yes, this is something I'm aware of. Right now I can only say that
the finish to my eyes is of equal quality to any other factory
finished black paint camera I 've seen. <p>I have in recent
months seen two non-original black cameras; the first was an
M3, which could perhaps best be described as a reverse "panda
M6" (ie the fittings on the top plate - wind-on, speed dial, release
and rewind kob were all chrome). I didn't take a close look at this
as it held no interest for me. The second however was an M2,
which at some point in its life had been converted to M2-R
status, and given a black finish. I inspected this camera closely,
and found the paint finish to be crude compared to a factory done
example. <b>If</b> this is a non-original camera, then it has
been done by a consumate professional.<p>I am very happy for
any potential purchaser to make a personal inspection (indeed
for UK buyers I would expect nothing less), and would refund
anyone not satisfied.
-
Apologies in advance if this gets anyone's back up.
I have just placed an ad for my black paint M4 camera elsewhere
on site. It can be viewed <a
href="http://www.photo.net/gc/view-one.tcl?classified_ad_id=496
648"> here</a>.<p>One of the photos referred to in the ad is
(sorry for finger marks on the camera!):<br><center><img
src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=102
0334&size=lg"></center><br>If unsold inside the next week (ie
ending 26th September 2002), the camera will be placed "you
know where"!
-
I mostly agree with Craig. An M6 is more convenient than using
the old MR meters or the VC.
Using an older M with a hand held is much nicer.
-
I agree, a well seen shot with impeccable timing. I don't think
though that it would gain anything from colour.
-
Both the M4 and M3 can be modified to take the Rapidwinder.
-
Sandy,
Yes, its the two "notches" on the RF patch. The narrow one is for
f/5.6, and the wider is for f/16
-
I haven't had the logging in/out problem, but occasionally the
links at page top, eg.<p>My Workspace: Community: Forums:
Leica Photography etc<p> appear down at bottom left of my
screen, and I have to scroll down to reach the threads. Anyone
else had that?
-
Very fine is Koudelka IMVHO. Some of his work can be seen
here, at<a
href="http://www.masters-of-photography.com/K/koudelka/koude
lka.html"> Masters of Photography</a>.<p>I have the reprint
version of his book "Exiles", and another title "Chaos", which is a
set of panoramic photos, shot if I remember right with a Linhof
617
-
<i>The only lens which can be and has been successfully
adapted is the fixed-focus 16mm Hologon.</i><p>Not so, after
his Elmarit was stolen/lost in Russia, Roger Hicks used a Zeiss
21mm f/4.5 Biogon from the old Contax Rangefinder on his M's
for several years.<p>This lens was adapted to use on the M
cameras, but by whom I don't know. If the original poster (sorry I
forgot who you are!) is interested in pursuing this course, it may
be worth contacting SRB film services of Luton here in the UK.
They are probably the kings of adapters! email is
SRBFILM@aol.com
-
Yes, Jay is right. The hood that was current when the Summaron
was available was code-named IROOA (later 12571). Here's one
on my M3<p><center><img
src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=924
753&size=md"></center><p>Your 12585 type will do the job just
as well though.
-
Perhaps the photo.net forums should have a bunch of smilies
like some others do. That ought to sort it ! then you guys can get
<img src=" http://jabberwoq.com/images/emoticons/angry.gif">
and <img
src="http://jabberwoq.com/images/emoticons/argue.gif"> till
you're blue in the face. Meanwhile the rest can chill out and have
a <IMG src="http://www.pressfotos.co.uk/beery.gif" !!
-
Yes, its a very nice lens indeed. I have an screw version for my
IIIg, which is just as good sharpness wise as more modern 35's
but with perhaps slightly cooler colour rendition. If you shoot
B&W of course that doesn't matter!
-
I had a look at one of these recently, but found the flexible shifting
screw somewhat disconcerting.
-
Jack,
I found the source <a
href="http://www.kievcamera.com/camera.php?ID=17">
here</a>. <p><p>Interestingly, it is claimed that this lens is
available in Leica R mount.
Elmar date
in Leica and Rangefinders
Posted
Hi John,
1956