ikar.us

I like the appearance of The landscape as dark silhouette in front of the sky, and of your profile and hair as light lines in front of the landscape.

Really great, since you could'nt see the illumination when taking the photo!

I know the experience, nearly perfect light is sometimes more annoying than bad light.

Probably a cumshaw for the coachman would have helped?

Well, to me it looked like just another boring fish-eye shot. As if the pohotographer had wanted to have an extreme wide-angle lens, but did have only a fish-eye.

To add a specifif critique: Fish-eye pictures have a special point, the center. It seems randomly placed, dictaded only by the necessarity of the desired borders on the left and right.

It looks appealing to me.

But it doesn't contain any photographed elements at all, it is pure computer graphics, isn't it?

In this thunderstrom situation, this part of the sky probably really looked dark. Behind us, it was light.

Additionally, the wide angele lens often gives underexposed images. But it looked nice to me, emphasizing the rainbow, the illuminated ship and the atmosphere.

Compared to the color slides I got out of a SLR under the same lighting conditions, the mobile phone seems to do it very well.

No need to be so malcontent! ;-)

Taken with classical equipment, advertising mobile phones...

But one silly question: what does »B&W« in the name of the film mean? Not Black&White, obviously.

The facade seems to be on the northern side?

Perhaps in the morning or eveening the illumination would be more convenient.