Mile

@mikemorrellNLi was talking about scaning in general. That pic is of course not scan, if its digital. Also i dont copy, just enjoy. I mean, what to copy, first, i find European cars so unattractive. American old cars have some sympathy for photo. Maybe Route 66, book "On the road" by Jack Kerouac helped to have that impression. I also enjoy "road movies" so... and nothing better than to pack stuff in car with camera and go on the road. @Dustin McAmeraThats some impressive camera i see. Where do you buy those photo panels ? let me see some in full res if you have.

@Dustin McAmerathat more dynamic shot. I suppose handshot !? Its not so sharp it could be. I have often problem many cameras dont have my dioptry, +1.75 All those Soviet cameras still work ? I have to refurbish my Lubitel, its not OK. Probably Zenit TTL too, but i use Canon 3000N or Olympus OM-10 when using film. I collected also Smena 6M, from my relatives in Belgrade, they dont use it. But saw many photos from it, my dad bought them, he was photoamateur. He also bought them that camera, in time of Yugoslavia we had more or less Eastern cameras. But that Saturn lens, is still "wanted". I will probably refurbish my Lubitel, i wanted to buy some better, but they want too much money. So i wanted now to buy some small Instax, for quick shot, for some X-mas photos. Then i just write date and location and here you are - the present. Polaroid or something similar. @mikemorrellNL we then have same taste. How would you call those photos "cars by night" with one word. I saw "stillness" by author. But i am sure you know some flowers painting where they use "stilness" category. But this kind of stilness is so different to those flowers paintings. To me, Edward Hopper with "Nighthawks" is resembling that taste. Yeap, next time photo will be on link, i think some copyvio when passed here image straight. Otherwise i read EXIF with Jeffrey Frield Exiftool, i just see its now "unavailable". I think it gave all info out. Can you tell me to what resolution you can have 135 and 120 scan !? In your country of course, or city. In Belgrade ; 6×6 HD 3636×3636 and 135 HD 3650×5444 Not sure if drum of flat scan.

True. He wrote back, it was Sony FF a7r. I asked him even before. Yes, i was mislead since he put more film medium format. I even thought it was medium frame digital. I was WOW if would be film, but for instance check this image from him: You can see shadows are far away from 1st (digital) image. I dont know to what size you can have scan, this one above is 5119×5119 px. I scanned my in Belgrade, max 6×6 from Lubitel2 was 3616×3616. This photo we talk about is 7253×4841 px. @Glen that would be around 55 lp/mm. I would really doubt 8 lp/mm would get such result even in my mind while opening on full resolution. @Dustin i still think its very very good shot. But if you think you have some similar or you think its even better let me see. Winner of some photo contests is here 😉anyway i use m4/3 and analogue 35 mm, but i started with Lubitel 2 and Zenit from my dad. I still use film since that "surprise" emotion when you see old shots. Best was i developed my old 120 movie after 35 years, almost heart attack... to see my 1st album. 😉 Sorry for mess, should read those comments where he said its digital. Normally if i dont see EXIF or camera there... its like without info, useless for me.

check This picture I do get Medium frame make it sharp, however i am so doubtful what proces was it ? I dont get that it is sharp from the start and all the way to that house in the back (normal focus stack on digital would do it). Next one, shadows under the car are so clear and enlighted. I could not find stars, but saw small "plane line" in bottom, so would guess it took some seconds of exposure. My guess was some -2 or -3 pull processing, with some good ISO 100 or 200 film, which could gave more than 150 lp/mm. I saw other shots, but just this one is so sharp. any comment... he has film shots. But he might did it with digital (focus stack + HDR) ?