Untitled

Comments are appreciated.

I really like the composition and groupings in this picture. The technical quality of the picture seems degraded either intentionally or otherwise.

well composed Bulent - there is lot's going on but nothing overlaps nothing and the main characters interest me, off in their own separate worlds, different from one another as two people can be. This is an interesting picture that invites the viewer to stay awhile - in spite of the technical glitches.

Well composed, but there seems to be some depth missing from this shot. Not sure if you could have done anything about it, but maybe a little more selective focusing could have improved the shot.

Thank you all very much for your comments on this photo.

As you have all noticed, this is a technically problematic image and that is entirely my fault. (Who else?)

This one was shot "from the hip" and my little camera's zoom was retracted unintentionally to its widest setting (24mm equivalent) to save power.

It was meant to be a rather tele composition (at 60 mm equivalent).

Post processing (I mean, a heavy crop) did not create a miracle!

Still, I felt enough charm remained there making it worthy of sharing.

there is 5 levels in this photography. in first two - a woody allen like philosoph vs pragmatism of youngster. the atlas/ world beteen them.

with better tech. quality, this could be street-classic.

what I miss here is a original rectangular frame.

 

BB

Thank you for your comment.

The explanations to your technical points is at my earlier comment (just above yours). It is all my fault. But, I am essentially a slow man much like monk, I think. I feel better when I spend looong minutes to hours to get a single, nice photograph. In scenes like this, I just cannot resist and shoot. But, I always make a few mistakes before I realize them. The scene never remains the same and evaporates completely most of the time, when I finish corrections :(