toddk1 0 Posted September 28, 2005 This isn't an image that should be on an art site. Disrespectful and just bad. Link to comment
ned1 0 Posted September 28, 2005 I assume this was meant as an imitation of the famous 60's surrealist dinner party series. If so, you have completely missed the point of it. The series worked not because of the food-covered nude on the table, but because of the indifference of the diners. Link to comment
ja_rek 0 Posted September 28, 2005 You've got some really nice photos in your portfolio but I suggest getting rid of this one. Link to comment
chromactiv 0 Posted September 28, 2005 Badly stitched together composite image, not sure what you're trying to say with this one, maybe: "I was bored one night and decided to trawl through some pictures and along the way teach myself how to use photoshop". Link to comment
rob scott 0 Posted September 28, 2005 I have to echo Jim's comment, there may have been some surrelist inspiration, but my guess is that that it's just a bad coincidence. Shallow, uncomposed, poorly lit, etc. Link to comment
billfoster 0 Posted September 29, 2005 I have to echo everyone else. I was stunned by how many interesting pictures there were in your portfolio because this sure isn't one. Link to comment
constantine 0 Posted September 29, 2005 I saw the rest of your portfolio and I think that you r a good photographer...but I don't understand this work, where is the art? At first look this seems to be a low quality shot of a lesbian orgy or something. Your other works r creative, funny and really good. This is just my opinion. Link to comment
bryce_mohan 0 Posted October 12, 2005 Wow, I couldn't help but laugh at the various responses to this photo. The funniest by far being the chap who indicated 'folks who expose themselves are to be born as a tree (and burned apparently) or some such nonsense, of course that certainly didn't stop him from browsing through the nudes category did it? LOL. Listen folks, I'm not particularly enamored of this photo myself but all the self righteous rhetoric we could surely do without. Telling someone their photo is 'bad' or 'should be removed' is way over the line of constructive criticism that photo.net is about. I'm particularly chagrined that the patrons commenting on this photo couldn't be bothered to be constructive (as if this was the first photo they've seen that they thought was in poor taste). Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now