Jump to content
This image is NSFW
© Roberto Roseano aka Carnisch

Gymnast on the Bed


carnisch

Copyright

© Roberto Roseano aka Carnisch

From the category:

Nude and Erotic

· 47,437 images
  • 47,437 images
  • 196,289 image comments


Recommended Comments

Guest Guest

Posted

This is nothing but vulgar. Exploitive nudity for nudity's sake.

 

If this is your idea of glamour, perhaps you need to go look at the TRUE glamour of the 30's, 40's and 50's. This is not glamour, it is pornography.

Link to comment
Derrick, you have just admitted you are vulgar by classifying this image is not vulgar.
Link to comment

so I really do not understand why these religuous prudish people are looking for nudes on this site and then get all upset when they see some anatomy ... parts are parts... all part of the body are clean and healthy .. it is in our mind where the dirt is .. so grow up man... if you are offended then stop looking.. that simple.. and I will further add that GOD made all the parts so stop using the bible or religion in general because you are uptight about the body...

 

 

Link to comment

Roberto, the only reason I am commenting on this photo is because of the words "Glam Shots"...this is not a glam shot in my opinion...To each his own but I would consider this to be more in the line of pornographic. I came to this pic by the tag word legs because I just posted one under legs...just thought I would mention that in case someone wants to point out that if I am offended maybe I shouldn't look...just don't understand why this would be considered a "glam shot".

 

Just my opinion, that's all...

Link to comment
I think it's funny how some people dismiss the comments of anyone who dislikes a nude image as "prudes" and religiuous fanatics. I am not a prude nor do I have a problem with genitalia depicted in a photo if it is artistic. But IMO there is nothing artistic about this image and it is clearly designed to appeal to prurient interests. So, I agree with those who characterize it as porn rather than glam.
Link to comment

I agree with the folks who state that this photo is more porno than glam. I don't see any artistic merit here at all, just a photo that directly implies sex (it's on a bed!).

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...