Orientation : 1
X Resolution : 300.000000
Y Resolution : 300.000000
Software : Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows
Published: Saturday 13th of March 2010 10:52:13 AM
Very good nude ^^^ BR ***Ali***
Pleasing image. Not vulgar in any way.
Derrick, you have just admitted you are vulgar by classifying this image is not vulgar.
nothing vulgar about this so I really do not understand why these religuous prudish people are looking for nudes on this site and then get all upset when they see some anatomy ... parts are parts... all part of the body are clean and healthy .. it is in our mind where the dirt is .. so grow up man... if you are offended then stop looking.. that simple.. and I will further add that GOD made all the parts so stop using the bible or religion in general because you are uptight about the body...
Roberto, the only reason I am commenting on this photo is because of the words "Glam Shots"...this is not a glam shot in my opinion...To each his own but I would consider this to be more in the line of pornographic. I came to this pic by the tag word legs because I just posted one under legs...just thought I would mention that in case someone wants to point out that if I am offended maybe I shouldn't look...just don't understand why this would be considered a "glam shot". Just my opinion, that's all...
I think it's funny how some people dismiss the comments of anyone who dislikes a nude image as "prudes" and religiuous fanatics. I am not a prude nor do I have a problem with genitalia depicted in a photo if it is artistic. But IMO there is nothing artistic about this image and it is clearly designed to appeal to prurient interests. So, I agree with those who characterize it as porn rather than glam.
I agree with the folks who state that this photo is more porno than glam. I don't see any artistic merit here at all, just a photo that directly implies sex (it's on a bed!).
Gymnast on the Bed If you like this picture, you can find other similar pictures in my portfolio.