carnisch 0 Posted March 13, 2010 If you like this picture, you can find other similar pictures in my portfolio. Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted March 13, 2010 This is nothing but vulgar. Exploitive nudity for nudity's sake. If this is your idea of glamour, perhaps you need to go look at the TRUE glamour of the 30's, 40's and 50's. This is not glamour, it is pornography. Link to comment
j_.l. 0 Posted March 15, 2010 Derrick, you have just admitted you are vulgar by classifying this image is not vulgar. Link to comment
johnya 0 Posted March 22, 2010 so I really do not understand why these religuous prudish people are looking for nudes on this site and then get all upset when they see some anatomy ... parts are parts... all part of the body are clean and healthy .. it is in our mind where the dirt is .. so grow up man... if you are offended then stop looking.. that simple.. and I will further add that GOD made all the parts so stop using the bible or religion in general because you are uptight about the body... Link to comment
trisha jean-angela 5 Posted April 10, 2010 Roberto, the only reason I am commenting on this photo is because of the words "Glam Shots"...this is not a glam shot in my opinion...To each his own but I would consider this to be more in the line of pornographic. I came to this pic by the tag word legs because I just posted one under legs...just thought I would mention that in case someone wants to point out that if I am offended maybe I shouldn't look...just don't understand why this would be considered a "glam shot". Just my opinion, that's all... Link to comment
allen_r1 0 Posted April 13, 2010 I think it's funny how some people dismiss the comments of anyone who dislikes a nude image as "prudes" and religiuous fanatics. I am not a prude nor do I have a problem with genitalia depicted in a photo if it is artistic. But IMO there is nothing artistic about this image and it is clearly designed to appeal to prurient interests. So, I agree with those who characterize it as porn rather than glam. Link to comment
em_fulk 0 Posted September 8, 2010 I agree with the folks who state that this photo is more porno than glam. I don't see any artistic merit here at all, just a photo that directly implies sex (it's on a bed!). Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now