phil r calgary ab canada 0 Posted November 13, 2004 there's sooo much grain that it almost took away from her skin tone and contrast of the photo IMHO, it's too bad that you didn't have more of a chance to reflect some light on her somehow or fill-in shadows, is there a reason behind that? because i really like the look on her face, the composition -- athough you chopped off her hand at the wrist ohwell -- and wild sensual tanktop and street style allured by people walking in the background, so keep shooting gooday Link to comment
John Peri 1,038 Posted March 9, 2005 I'm afraid that I don't agree with any of the commented above. First, the grain is the style in which the author presents his work. Secondly, what he has captured here is a moment frozen in time, the expression, the movement, everything is there. It is of no importance if a hand is missing. If anything, I find that a very amateur remark. if one looks at PHOTO or a top fashion magazine like Vogue, one can see that none of the truly succesful photographers care a hoot about a missing hand or foot ... Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now