Jump to content
© Copyright Inge Johnsson

Water in Crack, North Creek, UT


inge johnsson

Copyright

© Copyright Inge Johnsson

From the category:

Nature

· 201,433 images
  • 201,433 images
  • 631,992 image comments




Recommended Comments

the most slippery spot in the entire canyon! I hope you did not fall (one of my friends almost broke his elbow here). The picture is great. Maybe a little more diagonal would be better. Perfect shutter speed and exposure.
Link to comment
Yes, this is really slickrock in every sense of the word. This was my second time in the left fork of North Creek aka "The Subway". I had really been looking forward to going back and getting this particular shot right. I didn't slip and fall though :-)
Link to comment
Hi Inge - congratulations on having the vision to previsualise the final result. Only a knowledgeable photographer in harmony with nature could capture an image such as this. Reminds me of a vein of opal running through its native rock.
Link to comment
Wow, I am a sucker for flowing water, but this is a really great shot. It looks like a satin fabric twisting down the rock! Great exposure. And, of course, the colors!
Link to comment
The translucent rock surface, the delicate leaf colors against earrth tones and, oh yes, the otherworldly slash of flowing water combine to make this exquisitely memorable. --jim
Link to comment
Exposure too long for water..As somebody else pointed out, look of satin or silk, or even molten silver..Blurring is OK, but water is water, and should be shown as such, otherwise it is a gimmick that doesnt work..To give more balance, and depth, the top of the photo could have been more OO focus, and the camera closer to the flowers, maybe using even an 18mm...OR... was the water falling vertically..we cant tell...Was a tripod used..as detail is not clear on rocks and flowers..I guess if u use Canon and not Zeiss, u need all dem filters to help get some decent saturation...no wonder so many Canons go to Zeiss...
Link to comment
I saw this photo recently in Pop Photo. I think the only thing different is the arrangement of the leaves. Were you the author of that photo as well?
Link to comment
I looked at your folder and realized that there is another image that was in that same issue of Pop Photo. (within last year) I'm assuming it's you.
Link to comment

"Blurring is OK, but water is water, and should be shown as such, otherwise it is a gimmick that doesnt work".

 

WOW! I had no idea there was only one way to shoot water. I'm so thankful I haven't done blurring water (oh wait... I have).

 

Good grief Tom, I think the blurring WAS the point and it certainly isn't gimicki when done well as this obviously is.

Link to comment
Hi Jason, sorry I don't read Pop Photo so I haven't seen the pictures you are referring to. I'm pretty sure they're not mine, but there are probably photo credits in the magazine. These are all very public places (e.g. national parks) so I am most likely not alone in having photographed them.
Link to comment
... I assume the part about the Zeiss lenses was a joke, right? Kind of hard to judge lens detail, contrast, and sharpness from a 800 by 600 jpeg scan... The only filter I used on my lowly Canon lens was a warming polarizer to cut down the glare from the water on the rock surface.
Link to comment
Exceptional and impressive. Your whole portfolio is worth coming back to again and again. Thanks for allowing us to visit first class work.
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...