Jump to content

Landscapes Carved by Ice



Exposure Date: 2016:04:11 14:59:21;
ImageDescription: OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA;
Make: OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.;
Model: E-M5MarkII;
ExposureTime: 1/250 s;
FNumber: f/16;
ISOSpeedRatings: 200;
ExposureProgram: Aperture priority;
ExposureBiasValue: 0/1;
MeteringMode: Pattern;
Flash: Flash did not fire, auto mode;
FocalLength: 45 mm;
FocalLengthIn35mmFilm: 90 mm;
Software: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh);


From the category:

Landscape

· 290,486 images
  • 290,486 images
  • 1,000,012 image comments


Recommended Comments

Worked very hard to get the composition of this image just right and played with Siver

EfexPro to convert to BW. Any advice on what could be done better or differently is

greatly appreciated.

 

Much love

Link to comment

It's a very dynamic image Sevag captured very well! I think the framing is good although a little tight at top. Best regards, Rob

Link to comment

I'm a novice but there are two things that bother me. The subject matter is great, interesting and commands exploring (draws me in). However, I am distracted by not being able to see the center peak's top. It is just cut off. Also in regard to that peak, I have been told and thru my experience, agree that the primary subject is more interesting if not centered...but  in the + of one of the rule of 3 lines crossing. I understand that the entire carving is the subject but I would like to see more cropping on the left and bottom. The peaks on the left are not nearly as interesting as the "shaven" texture on the right sided peak which I think has much more drama and would have even more emphasis with a bit of sky beyond it. Hope this is of some value to you.

Link to comment

Being myself not a big fan of B&W photographie I find this one not quite bad.  The idea of the photo is very good an goes well with the real landscape.

My nits about this are:

1.- I think a more open view would make a better picture.

2.- The framing (as said in a comment before) with the top of the peak rising the upper frame creates a tensión which not helps for a pleasing image (always in the classical canons).

3.- The post processing on the sky is too grainy for my taste.

Anyway it's just my opinión, and finally photography is just a personal choice.  5/7.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...