tom_menegatos 0 Posted May 11, 2001 This was from a 35mm neg that I cropped the top and bottom off. Taken from Jersey City. I think the horizon is a little off level. I just noticed it I should have corrected it before putting it up. I'm not sure if the slide was in the scanner bad or the image was taken like that. I have another taken with a Yashica Mat on tungsten film that looks great but I don't have a mf film scanner. I think I'm going to get ti drum scanned to make some prints. When I do I'll put it up here. Link to comment
think27 0 Posted May 17, 2001 I've always wanted to shoot the NYC at nite shot... Very crisp and beautiful color, exposure, light reflection in the water. Link to comment
jonah_cheung 0 Posted June 22, 2001 This is a pretty picture, but why do you call it art? What are you trying to say with it? I don't get any real feeling from it. It looks more like a good, but typical stock photograph that you could sell to a calender company. Link to comment
marielou_dhumez 1 Posted October 12, 2001 Tom, before 11 sept rating would be 10 for esthetic and 6 for originality.... now it's 10/10... with tears... Link to comment
marc1 0 Posted October 20, 2001 this was and still is a wonderful shot, its just a shame on how its changed Link to comment
mealey 0 Posted January 25, 2002 I just love this shot. Maybe photo.net should revise the term 'originality' in the rating system. I see someone comments above that this image 'isn't original'! Maybe it should be something like 'Aesthetics' and 'Technical Competence' In which case this image easily deserves 8's, 9's and 10's! I just wish I'd shot this!! Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now