michaeljlawson 0 Posted November 28, 2008 Hello Kym and welcome to Photo.net. You've captured a nice moment here. I would probably crop a little more of the over-exposed sky out and play with the Contrast\Shadows and try to remove some of the sun flare off the dog. I spent about 5 minutes playing with it and came up with this. It could be done better with the full size image to work with. Link to comment
William Michael 2,270 Posted November 29, 2008 I suspect the original image is underexposed (for the Subject and the Foreground). Notwithstanding the effects of both the Veiling Flare and the Direct Flare: the initial underexposure renders the image difficult to retrieve to a full Tonal Range of the B&W spectrum. I expect this is, in part, is what was being attempted by the alternative offered. The tell is twofold: the lack of detail in the blacks and; the reduced tonal range both in the original and in the alternative. This might be of interest to you, in regard to recovering incorrect exposure: http://photo.net/beginner-photography-questions-forum/00R27T This might be of interest to you, in regard to Flare: http://photo.net/beginner-photography-questions-forum/00QxjQ These technical comments also go to enhance my input to your post here: http://photo.net/beginner-photography-questions-forum/00RdUj WW Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now