bugetti 0 Posted September 26, 2008 Belle inquadrature (è il Piano Grande dei Sibillini, vero?) Link to comment
iancoxleigh 0 Posted September 28, 2008 I have never encountered such a display of wildflowers out in the wild myself! Then, to combine it with a great display of sun-rays is simply unbelievable. Gorgeous image! Link to comment
whydangle 0 Posted September 28, 2008 Simply amazing to my eyes. I could be bothered by the grad line darkening the mountain ridge, but so much of this is stunning, I am distracted by the sheer beauty. Link to comment
Stock-Photos 1 Posted September 29, 2008 It is indeed an eye-catching image. You did enter this for critique, so I've got to speak my mind. IMHO, red flowers are too vivid, over-saturated. Especially with the light source behind a cloud, behind a mountain. Too much saturation overall in the bottom half of the image. Link to comment
whydangle 0 Posted September 29, 2008 I do not see these wildflowers as oversaturated, although I can't know for sure if post-processing ramped up the saturation or not. I believe it is more the fact that the flowers, although in the partial shade and the sun is obscured by clouds, are in fact backlit, which creates a glow. My guess is that Luca has applied levels or curves to establish white and black points and nothing more. I make this comment because I have firsthand captured the same effect with both film and digital. Perhaps what nature has provided is too strong for some, then a reduction of saturation might be called for. For me, I love the color and the vivid feel of this. If I were to say it is too strong, I would point out the band of green just above the flowers, but I am also guessing the greens are rich because of the time of year and the backlighting as well. Link to comment
alextremps 0 Posted February 20, 2009 Maravillosa perspectiva de flores y campiña verde italiana! excelente. Se nota bastante el cambio de exposición en las montañas aunque no la desmerece un ápice. Link to comment
various things 0 Posted December 12, 2010 what the unaltered orignal (RAW or JPG) looked like? This is a nice result, however, to me it appears that there was quite a lot of pp applied. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now