mclain swift 0 Posted August 19, 2007 Don't like it. You've ruined what would be a very soft and lovely image. Link to comment
amitai schwartz 0 Posted August 20, 2007 Nothing's ruined, in my opinion. It's just art. You have made an ordinary shot of two naked woman into something to contemplate. My only nit is the texture on the legs of the lady on the left is not very attractive. Link to comment
JPPhoto1664880217 5 Posted August 20, 2007 Does a foto need to be attractive to be good art???? Link to comment
cliverapier 0 Posted August 20, 2007 If anything, theres too much colour. maybe just a small bit of color somwhere and thats IT! I did like the original B&W though. Is it art? No. Its more an abstract photographic thing using loud colors on top of a good photo. :) Link to comment
linda carlson 0 Posted August 20, 2007 Hi Jim. This image makes me want to play too! To my eye, the most interesting part of this image (and the most balanced) is the top "square" that includes the faces and upper torsos of the models. Also, since you are going for creativity, not realism, what about inverting sections of the image, or the whole thing. Bravo for creating something entirely new.Linda Carlson Link to comment
philippe_carly 0 Posted August 21, 2007 Sorry, not THIS time Jim.... Especially the orange square on the left on the left : it gives a her grainy and wrinkled skin. And I don't think the colored sqares really ADD anything to the final result. MAYBE if the background had been whiter....... Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now