animals What're you looking at...

comments and crique are welcome and appreciated, espicialy for low

ratings...

How nice the way he looks!

lol, thats what i said.

 

So, out of curiosity, how come aesetheics are getting worse marks than originality? i would have though that it would be the other way around.

Hi Dan, thanks for your com. on my portfolio!

For me it was an original photo, because here we dont see animals like this in "wild", not where i live. I didnt really like the animal on the left, thats why i gave you 5 for aesthetics, but a 5 is not worse i quess :) Best regards, Ellen.

no no, i had no idea what you rated, i really meant in general. A 5 is definetly not something i would complain about! I saw the 3's ticking up though on my portfolio home page and so decided to post that question. Thanks for your explaination, that does help.

I think 3/3 is much too low for this photo....

( I knew you were not complaining about the rating i gave you, i understood that already. thanks for your responce and God bless, Ellen.)