jc11664880155 0 Posted April 22, 2006 finally after several attempt i cought one. feel free to comment. thanks everyone..... Link to comment
jc11664880155 0 Posted April 25, 2006 thank you very much for you time sir. your always entitle to you opinion. thanks again. Link to comment
f1-fanatic 0 Posted April 25, 2006 JoJo, My comments are not based on an opinion but experience, moreover: 1) Brass tumbles when it strikes the ejector. These aren't in motion 2) The lighting isn't changing on the cylinder of the brass from round to round nor on the back of the top most shell where the flash would have exposed the back and primer as it did the slide of the weapon. 3) The two pistols you photographed don't have the cyclic rate to fire that many rounds per minute 4) The projectle being fired should have a longer "tail" (notice the crimp on the brass in both photos) 5) There are no sparks from the ignition of the primer/powder exiting the barrel which would be very noticable at night also known as muzzle flash. 6) The slide of the weapon appears to be locked open and not in battery 7) There wouldn't be a shadow behind the gun. Please take this as constructive criticism and what to look for to help make future shots look more realistic. Link to comment
jasonj 0 Posted April 30, 2006 This is very nice photo, I had to laugh though at the comment from Norman.. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now