david at pure eye photo 0 Posted April 19, 2006 this is beautfiully eerie, mehmet. kinda transparent, ghostly. Link to comment
tmhutchins 0 Posted April 19, 2006 Nice use of tone. Would like to know how this was taken. Excellent!! Link to comment
keeperofthefire 0 Posted April 19, 2006 Does this scene actually exsist in Nature, or is it man-made? Regards, Charles Link to comment
jayme 0 Posted April 19, 2006 The composition, subject & tonal range & color choice are all excellent. However, it is difficult to judge the detail on this web sized image. I'd love to see it for real :) Link to comment
ictenbey 0 Posted April 19, 2006 oldukca guzel bir kare ... tebrikler ! ... saygilarimla ! .. Link to comment
keeperofthefire 0 Posted May 5, 2006 I think I figured it out Mehmet. This is a computer generated double-exposure. I'm pretty sure you took the 2nd mtn. range back, turned it around backwards, and enlarged it to use it for the 3rd one. Now, when it comes to the clouds, water, island, shoreline, and the 1st mtn., what's real? Please don't be offended with me breaking down your shot, it's giving me something to do for the momment. Best Regards, Charles Link to comment
mozgur 0 Posted May 5, 2006 Charles, What is "computer generated double exposure"? First let me say that I did respond specifically to your question a while back, it remained posted few days, then due to reasons I will not discuss here, it was removed. Secondly, you are right that what you call "mountain range" is reused. However, it is NOT a mountain range, and you are wrong if you think "mountain range" is a computer generated image. It is a REAL natural formation. Overall there were 7+ photographs used to create the final image. Link to comment
keeperofthefire 0 Posted May 6, 2006 Sorry Mehmet if I upset you. "Computer-generated" is just another way of saying Photoshopped, and perhaps they're sand castles, I thought they were mountains? I said double-exposure, but I guess it was multiple. Interesting image anyway, regardless if it is fake. Peace be the journey,Charles Link to comment
mozgur 0 Posted May 7, 2006 One man's garbage is another's gold. Funny, how perceptions are colored by personal convictions. Charles, have you thought that the "fake" art may be the only art there is? As one of those poor souls who follows the tripod holes of great masters, I came to believe that "documentation" is not a form art. Link to comment
keeperofthefire 0 Posted May 7, 2006 One man's trash can be another man's treasure, and your point is well taken. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now