ada-ipenburg 0 Posted April 30, 2006 Leuk om je weer eens te zien en bedankt voor je positieve, complimenteuze commentaar op zowel mijn bio als op bovenstaand 'duister object'. Ja je hebt eigenlijk wel gelijk; De tegenstelling is groot, al hoewel minder groot dan je zo op het eerste gezicht zou denken. Ik bezit namelijk ook een zeer duistere kant, maar wie niet, wij toch allemaal wel een beetje?;-) Groetjes en veel succes met de studie Hans, Ada;~) Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted May 2, 2006 I prefer this one, without the ghost tree, I'm sincere: it doesn't contribute nothing for the composition. There's a great ambiance, the light and depth of this shot is really attractive. Moody! I said : ) Link to comment
ada-ipenburg 0 Posted May 13, 2006 Great to see you and thank you very much for your opinion. Nice to read your kind comment and to hear that you prefer this one. Now (after I haven't seen both pictures for a while) I have came to the final conclusion that this one is my favourite too. Sometimes an interval is usefull. Greetz, Ada:) Link to comment
ada-ipenburg 0 Posted May 13, 2006 Hi and great you're here to advice me. I will try to restore the distracting spots on the basis of your explanation. Many greetings and thanks a lot for your help Wilson, Ada:~) Link to comment
lizweisiger 0 Posted December 24, 2007 Ada, obviously, many fine photographers have visited this image, and left comments. I will say that, for me, I enjoy this scene because it is different. I like that the composition is unusual and hard to describe. The red building and the canal bring great interest. Plus, your talent with editing makes this worth studying awhile. No need for a "phantom tree" for me! Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now