marius barbulescu 0 Posted September 22, 2005 Very funny shadow, impossible to miss. I can even see the camera shape on it. 6\6 because it quite original and looks good (both the girl and the picture) Link to comment
toddk1 0 Posted September 23, 2005 This is a shot that is porn, not art. Lighting is not great, composition is less than attractive and the shot is more gimicky than good photography. Link to comment
stoura 0 Posted September 23, 2005 TK: try not to be so uncomfortable, to see naked woman... if U think, that this is porn, so I don?t know, what is not... but its truth, that this is not art, this is fun... Link to comment
hbipul 0 Posted September 23, 2005 Looks like Mr Todd Kuhns is the porn teacher here in photo.net. He is defining pornography and art. He could have claimed himself a prophet if was born some hundred years ago. And maybe that would be the perfect time for him. Best regards. Link to comment
rick_hensil 0 Posted September 24, 2005 Is this a self-portrait? I didn't know we had such hotties on Photo.net! Link to comment
posarlie 0 Posted March 21, 2006 I think mister todd kuhns should look somewhere else for porn, because this picture it is not porn in any way on the contrary this is art !.I think is never to late for mister kuhns to learn something from jan mlcoch! Link to comment
johannes_schenk1 0 Posted September 9, 2010 Content wise :weak. What is fun about this?Composition: there is none.Tonality: set up the right way you could have something here. As it is it's just crude.Sensuality: none. She looks like she's gargling or stretching a kink out of her back. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now