maurice_bryant Posted May 7, 2001 Share Posted May 7, 2001 Is there a medium format back, or camera which will allow you to rewind the film and re-shoot a frame? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russell_britt Posted May 7, 2001 Share Posted May 7, 2001 You can`t rewind 120 film as its only taped to the paper on one end, you can always remove the back ,use a different back and then put the first one back on the camera to shoot a double exposure. Is this what you are after? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_goldfarb Posted May 7, 2001 Share Posted May 7, 2001 I don't know of any camera in any format where multiple exposure involves rewinding the film. Different cameras will do this in different ways. One way with a removable back is to take the first exposure, remove the back, cock the shutter, replace the back, and take the second exposure (lather, rinse, repeat). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_ongun Posted May 7, 2001 Share Posted May 7, 2001 If you want double/multiple exposures, most cameras will let you disable the winder or switch to multiple exposure mode (Rollei <g> ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maurice_bryant2 Posted May 7, 2001 Share Posted May 7, 2001 A little more detail: I am trying to think of ways to make my own 35mm back to put onto a MF camera, say an RB 67, and hopefully save the cash that it would cost to buy a camera AND an expensive back. I was thinking that if the film could be re-wound, I would just have to make a mask, and maybe part of a spool to hold the 35mm canister in place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_oleson Posted May 8, 2001 Share Posted May 8, 2001 I don't think it's going to be that easy, Maurice. Why was it that you wanted to shoot 35mm film in an RB67? That would make for one heck of an awkward 35mm camera. rick :)= rick_oleson.tripod.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_kimble Posted May 8, 2001 Share Posted May 8, 2001 If your planning on using 35mm film then you will be better off using it in a decent 35mm camera. Why have all that MF camera,lens, finder etc when your only using 1/3 of the image coming thru the lens. Kinda like having a Cadilac with a VW engine. Can be made to work but it wont go very fast. If you really wanta use 35mm in a MF then get a 35mm back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maurice_bryant Posted May 8, 2001 Author Share Posted May 8, 2001 I guess I'm trying to squeeze two cameras out of one. I've considered a Bronica S2A (135 N/W back), and a Rollei TLR (with a Rolleikin), but I'd like to get 6/7 SLR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wayne_crider3 Posted May 9, 2001 Share Posted May 9, 2001 ?? Mask your viewfinder or get an architectural screen to give you the proportions of a 35mm film view. Creating a back is a waste of money and time. You might want to try a darkslide that is cut on one side for a 1/2 horizontal frame exposure. Turn it upside down in a 6x6 camera where you can double expose for the second shot. You will need a whole slide to take the back off. 6x4.5 is the same proportionally (1:1.5) as 35mm film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellis_vener_photography Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 Very old thread but a friend of mine used to do double exposures on medium format film by shooting the entire roll, winding it up and in a dark bag rewinding it on the original core. Not very precise but he got better at it the more he did it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now