michael_pye Posted February 25, 2004 Share Posted February 25, 2004 Hi,Simple question really.I mentioned in another post I was wanting to scan some old glass plates into my computer and was looking for a scanner.Being that some are 10"x8" plus and my budget is about £150.I thought I might try and make a Transparency Adaptor instead. Is the Transparency Adaptor that comes with scanners just a static light that illuminates the slide/neg? Or does it have more functiions e.g. gets brighter when the scanner is going over the image and say the image is under exposed? My guess is it's just a light hiding behind some white perspex? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan_ratzlaff Posted February 25, 2004 Share Posted February 25, 2004 That is essentially the case, however in order to get good results you need a fair amount of even light. It does not need to vary in brightness. YOu also need to be able to rurn off the light for reflective materials. In theory, if the negative is not too dense, you may be bqle to use a gepe light panel as a transparency light source. It may be bright enough. Anyway it would be cheap enough and cover enough space. The only problem with flatved scanners is that they genrally do not vary the exposure time especially if you are trying to fool the scanner into thinking it is still scanning reflective material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cliff_rames Posted February 26, 2004 Share Posted February 26, 2004 I haven't tried this myself, but read in a book about photography by Ralph Evans, that it might be possible to scan negatives (and transparencies) on a flatbed by placing a mirror over the negative. Recommended was a front-surfaced mirror, in particular, a piece of polished metal. I guess the emulsion side should be up, in contact with the mirror to minimize ghosting. Since the light is making two passes through the emulsion, the density is doubled. You can compensate for this with a gamma adjustment in your image editor. If this works it would be nice because it is simple, inexpensive, avoids having to worry about disabling the scanner's internal light, and should not interfere with the scanner's self-calibration. Regards, Cliff Rames Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crowe Posted February 26, 2004 Share Posted February 26, 2004 I have tried the mirror idea and the white cardboard pentaprism reflector idea and neither is acceptable. The closest I came was laying a 24" fluorescent light across the flatbed scanner with a 35mm slide beneath it but the light was not even across the slide but this was effective enough to post here. I just removed that photo yesterday from my folder but I probably have a copy of it. So the main problem is getting even, fairly high intensity, light across the 10"x8" (as you say in Great Britain) surface. I was using a crappy 8 year old scanner so a current model would record the info that much better. Good luck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drpratik_pipalia Posted May 29, 2014 Share Posted May 29, 2014 <p>I have tried this. <img src="https://photos-4.dropbox.com/t/0/AABN4Ks3pBhs6XcnkRArXR-RhYh4POzqh3bSTWUlpC4lTg/12/120542836/jpeg/1024x768/3/1401379200/0/2/img003.jpg/ELlsA0gyW4KZw1zfCZO69nPeqmoFuGICapy5TJWf8-c" alt="" width="768" height="900" /> <br> <img src="https://www.dropbox.com/meta_dl/eyJzdWJfcGF0aCI6ICIiLCAidGVzdF9saW5rIjogZmFsc2UsICJzZXJ2ZXIiOiAiZGwuZHJvcGJveHVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsICJpdGVtX2lkIjogbnVsbCwgImlzX2RpciI6IGZhbHNlLCAidGtleSI6ICJ3bWlkeGI1bWUzdnV0a3AifQ/AAJ9ffgm4-yWDj5yhimT1Loly--biYymi6HDCx0-OPR-dQ?dl=1" alt="" /></p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now