Gloom

[brett_davis1]

I was actually just trying to figure out if the roll in the camera was

24 or 36 exposure, so I was banging off a couple of extra shots.

This is terribly underexposed but I kind of liked the effect.<div></div>

[steve_hoffman]

I like it.

 

Brett, do you enjoy using the Leica 0? Do you have any other shots using that camera that you could post?

 

 

www.stevehoffman.tv

[dougmiles]

Underexposed as well, dim window light.<div></div>

[m_.]

had to do a lot of tweeking on ps.<div></div>

[brett_davis1]

Thanks for the responses. Steve, to answer your question, I do

like the camera a lot, although I would say it's not for everyone. If

you search by my name you should find a few other posts I've

made here and there. My not-very-good scanner is hooked up to

a suicidal computer so posting is sort of hit and miss for me. For

some reason, I got these developed at Ritz Camera; when did

their printing get so lousy? They are garish inkjet prints now. I

was actually planning to post a different picture but could not get

it to scan well at all.

[Karim Ghantous]

Brett, that's a neat shot considering it's poorly exposed. Maybe you could set things up a bit nicer and try again. Reminds me of 'Mulholland Drive' with the phones near the lamps.

[ralph_barker]

<center>

<img border=2 src="http://www.rbarkerphoto.com/misc/Travel/BshipPk1203-0214NavRoom-600bw.jpg">

<p>gloomy by design - navigation room, USS Alabama</p></center>

[Spearhead]

<center>

<img src="http://www.spirer.com/images/garage.jpg"><br>

<i>Garage, Copyright 2003 Jeff Spirer</i></i></center</center>

[Brad_]

<center>

<img src= "http://pages.sbcglobal.net/b-evans/Web/image/tunnelpair2-4x5.jpg">

</center>