mikey_campbell Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 I'm going on a trip to Japan next week and was looking around for a dealer that supplies rental lenses. I tried contacting a few, but no one seems to have a 28mm for rent. I'm planning on taking my 50mm cron and 90mm ASPH up with me, but I also wanted to take a wide- angle for those beautiful scenic shots. Anyway, if anyone has any information, it would be greatly appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_kastner Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 Well, it may be a little late, and I also don't know where you live. Also, let's say you'll be in Japan for under two weeks. What I myself would do is this: buy a new lens like the one you're interested in, take it with you, be reeaalllly careful with it, and when you return home, go to the store and get your money back. At least here, where I live, that returnability is a federal law or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_r._fulton_jr. Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 That's not a bad suggestion. If you rent, you'll have to be reeeeeallly careful, too. You have to return in same condition as when you rented it. I rented an MP and lens from Rich Pinto at Photo Village in NYC. He sent me a NIB MP for the rental. I had to be very careful with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_kastner Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 John's recommendation is also nice because you might possibly be so happy with the lens that you'll want to keep it anyways. Also, a really "good" store would/should take it back (in perfect condition) even several weeks later. Buy more film too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricks Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 i don't thin rent is affordable for two weeks. just buy a used CV 28mm lens, use it and if you like it, keep it. otherwise sell it with little/no loss. using a new lens for 2 weeks and then returning is unethical IMO. would anyone here like to buy a "new" lens from e.g. B&H knowing that someone took it on a field trip to Asia for 1/2 a month?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_sampson Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 Try Lens & Repro in NYC. Longer-term rentals are cheaper than the day rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roger_michel Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 i think you will be unpleasantly surprised at the rental cost. this is a situation where working with a dealer over time can be a real boon. if you have a relationship with a dealer, arranging the loan of a used lens can be very easy -- if you have a good track record of buying. you might try newtonville camera in newton mass 617 965 1240. ask for michael. if he has a used lens he may help you out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Smith Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 Fotocare in NYC might have a rental 28mm too, but I do suspect it will be expensive. I can only concur with what Roger says. When my 'cron 50mm got smashed, my dealer lent me one free of charge for a trip to Greece - that is what a good dealer might do for you. Robin Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
furcafe Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 Perhaps you should consider renting in Japan. I would think that there are some lenses available in that country ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_r._fulton_jr. Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 When I rented from Rich Pinto it was $150/week for MP + 35mm Lux-asph. Not unreasonable. I only sent the MP back to him and purchased the lens. He applied the rental of the lens toward the purchase price. Again, very fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_carson Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 The Voigtlander 28mm f/3.5 is only $289 brand new. That's two weeks of rental at $150 right there. And heck, you'll use it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chip l. Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 I am surprised there is not more comment over Michael comment. To my knowledge working for a dealer in the US that there is any Federal law that requires returns. The law I believe is that it needs to be clearly stated. Any return privilege offered by dealers is a privilege. Not a right. It is not meant to be a short term rental. Keep in mind we are not talking about a lens that sells in the $300 to $500 range. My experience is that people with the higher end lenses are looking for "totally" new lenses. Beyond that Michael, what you are proposing is equal to theft. Whether out right or or under deception. it is theft. Inventory that left a store is considered sold. If returned it is a liability against the store. Also most stores that I am aware of keep a list of those that "rent" equipment. I am not sure that a sincere user would want to be be on that list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_kastner Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 Chip, I understand what you're getting at, and -- whether you believe it or not -- I myself not not cherish such a thing... <p>(1) I mentioned this idea to Mikey because he is looking for a certain solution, and might not find anything else. <br>(2) The whole idea comes not from me, but from others, on the forum here and also in general. <br>(3) Don't forget that I pointed out that Mikey might end up possibly liking the lens so much that he'd buy the thing anyways. <br>(4) Finally, do not forget that any old store, yes, even a "good" photo shop usually does everything it can, in order to sell the thing in the first place! <p>I would not call this a case of "theft". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_kastner Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 So, Chip, another thought, now that I re-read your last note. Bulltweed... <p><i>Also most stores that I am aware of keep a list of those that "rent" equipment. I am not sure that a sincere user would want to be be on that list.</i> <p>A real sincere user will certainly want to be on that list. The more he is, the more he can expect and the more he can in fact get from that store. Man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markci Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 Stores are not required to take returns by any law, federal or otherwise. And what Michael is suggesting is certainly unethical, if not fraudulent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chip l. Posted March 10, 2004 Share Posted March 10, 2004 Michael, thanks for your comments. It was not an attack on you, but the perception of some that stores are rental places. Because of that thought we have many stores that have limited their return "privileges". What you suggested does make it harder for those that want time to decide on their purchases. And while you mentioned the original poster maybe buying the lens in the end, it did appear to be more of an after thought. At one time I did work for Micro Center. They at the time had 30 day return on any purchase, But becuase of abuse they scaled it back to 14 days on notebooks, and no returns on software. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob soltis Posted March 10, 2004 Share Posted March 10, 2004 Folks, Federal law provides for a limited cooling off period (3 or 5 days, I believe) for certain installment contracts in very limited situations, this one NOT included. IMHO, as an attorney, the concept of a dealer 'privilege' to ban returns has some limits. As a matter of contract law, "all sales final," "no cash refund", or "store credit only" policies must be clearly posted in the store, and must be stated to the customer before the sale is completed, especially in California. Neither the "cooling off period" nor the requirement that "all sales are final" be clearly posted would allow return of the lens. Even though the dealer gets the lens back, it's fraudulent because the dealer loses value in the lens, not because the lens went out and came back. Having once worked in law enforcement, I could see a clever police officer making out a case for embezzlement or theft by deception. This is free legal advice, and not intended to provoke flames, etc. While well-intentioned, the suggestion proposes something that isn't right. In the words of Mark Twain, "Always do what is right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest." When I bought my first M6 from what used to be Colonial Camera in La Grange, Illinois, they rented used lenses with a credit toward the purchase price. Check with them, presuming they're still around. Good luck, happy snaps, and bon voyage. Bob Soltis La Jolla, California Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikey_campbell Posted March 10, 2004 Author Share Posted March 10, 2004 Guys, Thanks a lot for your responses, it was really helpful. I was thinking about purchasing the lens, but since I will only settle for the "best" for my Leica ;) , the possiblity of affording a new 28mm 1:2.0 is nil. I'll take a look at the places you suggested and see what they can offer. I live in Hawaii and there are absolutely no Leica dealers here. It's a sad state of affairs, but I'm hoping if I just keep buying B&H will open a store here just for me...in my house:) Anyway, thanks for all your help again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now