mikep1 Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 I'm getting back into the wet darkroom and have found several Leitz Focomat V35s available - all with color heads. My previous Darkroom experience is totally B/W using enlargers without color heads. Is there any disadvantage to using a color head for B/W? Can the color be "dialed out" so there is no effect? I was originally thinking of trying to find a nice Focomat 1c but the prices are very high - all the bidders are from Japan - apparently collectors. They don't seem to be collecting the V35...yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sal dimarco Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 Mike, If you check with the manufacturer of your favorite photographic paper, they can supply you with the filter formulas for the various contrast grades of paper. You can just dail them in via the color head. Filtration above the negative will give you a greater level of sharpness than filters below the lens. Happy Snaps, Sal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_hintlian1 Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 Mike... To add to what Sal said. Leica has the color filter equivalent combos for VC contrast grades, at least they did when I called them several years ago asking the same question. And I might add that after trying that arrangement -- dialing in 3 colors to mimic VC grades -- I bought the V35 VC head and was (and still am) WAY happier with the convenience and results. I have no idea where you can find one but I'd bet they turn up from time to time in any of the usual places. About Focomat 1c enlargers, there is a 1c "color" that has a filter drawer in the head above the condenser. You may have to knock the tab off polycontrast filters to use the drawer (I forget) but it works pretty well...even if a bit awkward. The 1c has a different "look" vis a vis the V35...both amazing enlargers. Good luck, MH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed_balko3 Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 A color head works quite well for B&W and with variable contrast papers. Kodak provides color head settings corresponding to different contrast grades in the paper data sheets; I believe that this is true of the other manufactureres as well. Papers differ in the "hardest" contrast grade that is possible with a given color head. Polymax RC, for example, will print all the way to grade #5 with an Omega Dichroic head, for example, but Polymax Fine Art delivers a grade #4 at the same filtration. If a higher contrast grade is required then use a gel VC filter, such as the Ilford, under the mixing box with the color head set for white light. There are two different tables of color head settings vs. contrast grade value being published. One type of table is speed matched, like most VC filter sets, and an exposure determined with one set of filter settings will be approriate (or approximately appropriate) for others in the table. The other type of table is not speed matched and generally these tables offer settings for higher contrast grades than the speed matched tables. This is true of some VC filter sets as well, where the filters are really only speed matched over a part of their range and not matched above contrast grade #4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
douglas k. Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 B&W printing with a color (i.e., dichro) head is terrific. Using VC papers, just set the magenta and yellow filtration to get normal contrast (which is the grade 3 setting on a dichro head), make a test strip and test print to find the right exposure, then make finer contrast adjustments by dialing in compensating adjustments to the Y and M settings. For instance, for more contrast, dial in 20 more units of M, and dial in 20 fewer Y units, and you'll get more contrast with the same overall exposure, thus eliminating the need for more test strips. For me, it's much faster and uses less paper than a condensor enlarger with those VC filters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hans_beckert Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 You are better off with condensers for B&W, unless you use chromogenic B&W films. Condensers provide better contrast and tonal qualty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
george_l._doolittle Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 Mike, get the book "Leica Darkroom Practice" . It give all the filtration and compensation factors for printing b/w with a color head. I'm sure you can get it from www.camerabooks.com Having said that, I finally broke down and got a VC unit which is still available from Leica Parts Dept. It really simplifies the process. Enjoy the V35...it's a magnificent instrument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david j.lee Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 mike, you can use it with no problem at all. ilford papers include the correct setting for the V35 in all their boxes in half a grade increments. the only diference with the vario-contrast module is that exposure times remain the same at diferent contrast settings with the v/c module. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikep1 Posted February 29, 2004 Author Share Posted February 29, 2004 Thanks Guys - Really great Info!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
douglas k. Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 <i>You are better off with condensers for B&W, unless you use chromogenic B&W films. Condensers provide better contrast and tonal qualty.</i><p>Complete nonsense. A skilled printer can make prints from each type that will look identical. I did it regularly while using the two different enlarger types. Then I settled on a dichro head for its superior ease of use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hans_beckert Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 Hans wrote: <b>You are better off with condensers for B&W, unless you use chromogenic B&W films. Condensers provide better contrast and tonal qualty.</b><p> Douglas K. replied.<p> <i>Complete nonsense. A skilled printer can make prints from each type that will look identical. I did it regularly while using the two different enlarger types. Then I settled on a dichro head for its superior ease of use.</i><p> Hans retorts: Douglas repeats, innocently, a typical misconception that has led many miniature-format workers astray. A skilled photographer develops his film according to the kind of enlarger he uses. When using a condenser enlarger, the film is typically developed about 20% less. This, in itself, provides a sharper, finer-grained negative, which is essential for 35mm work. The condenser provides more contrast, which makes up for the difference in developing time. Using a slightly higher grade of paper ( 2 1/2 to 3) is also advisable. <p> This misconception has been repeated so many times, that I thought it important to set the record straight. Settling for 'ease of use' is just that: <b>settling</b>. The worker interested in superior results uses condensers. Don't settle, aim for the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
douglas k. Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 Your "retort" does not even attempt to explain how the condensor head provides "better contrast and tonal qualty." And if you can see the greater sharpness and smaller grain resulting from 20% shorter development (an excessive adjustment, in my experience), then congrats to you. I've used both light sources with the same negs, I find dichro heads more convenient, and I have always been able to match print quality from one type to the other. Ergo, I prefer the dichro head. That's real experience, not self-justification for my own decisions or repeating something read in a book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hans_beckert Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 Douglas K. , feb 29, 2004; 08:17 p.m. Your "retort" does not even attempt to explain how the condensor head provides "better contrast and tonal qualty." Simple: The Callier effect. "And if you can see the greater sharpness and smaller grain resulting from 20% shorter development (an excessive adjustment, in my experience), then congrats to you." I can. Too bad for you. Have your vision checked. "I've used both light sources with the same negs, I find dichro heads more convenient, and I have always been able to match print quality from one type to the other. Ergo, I prefer the dichro head. That's real experience, not self-justification for my own decisions or repeating something read in a book." The point is you don't use the same negs!!!! The point is you don't use the same negs!!!! The point is you don't use the same negs!!!! The point is you don't use the same negs!!!! You develop the film differently! Convenience is NOT the same thing as QUALITY. If you care to read what I wrote and respond to that, then we can continue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray . Posted March 1, 2004 Share Posted March 1, 2004 Mike, I've got the book that lists settings corresponding to contrast grade for Ilford and (Agfa or Kodak?) variable contrast papers. It also lists corresponding filter factors to compensate for exposure time differences. Email me if you want the info, I don't have the book handy at the moment. Actually Douglas' suggestion to dial out equal parts of yellow when you dial up magenta to increase contrast.... sounds like a good one. I'll have to try that myself. The VC head is probably the ideal solution, but the color head works sufficiently. Add a $1500 Highland Splitgrade for automated exposure calculation if you want to really speed up the darkroom process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray . Posted March 1, 2004 Share Posted March 1, 2004 btw, I highly recommend the V-35... produces excellent results and is a pleasure to use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
douglas k. Posted March 1, 2004 Share Posted March 1, 2004 Actually, I did begin adjusting my film speed and development times when I switched to the diffusion light source (dichro head). So I was producing different negs. The resulting prints, made with the dichro head, looked better than the earlier negs made for the condensor enlarger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hans_beckert Posted March 1, 2004 Share Posted March 1, 2004 Impossible. Developing more causes loss of sharpness and increased graininess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now