abe_petrow Posted August 13, 2003 Share Posted August 13, 2003 I am interested in studio still life tabletop photography with my p67. I have a 45, 75, and 200. Which one lens would be the sharpest for my studio, the 135, 105, or 165mm, and macro or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stemked Posted August 13, 2003 Share Posted August 13, 2003 Not having used the 105 and 165 I can only say that I have been very pleased and impressed with the 135mm macro. I suspect though if your plans are to shoot stills the close focusing of the 135mm would be a desciding factor. Maybe a better question would be to compare the 100 macro and 135 macro for your needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
douglas_green1 Posted August 14, 2003 Share Posted August 14, 2003 I'd go with the 135mm Macro. It's also good at longer distances, and it nicely fills the only gap in your lineup as well. Plus, the fact that it will continuously focus down past 1/4 life size will make it quite useful for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now