igord Posted September 21, 2003 Share Posted September 21, 2003 Just a girl in bikini top with risky top lighting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkantor Posted September 21, 2003 Share Posted September 21, 2003 That high-contrast look is very popular today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william_le Posted September 22, 2003 Share Posted September 22, 2003 That photo looks over sharpened. Jagged edges. You could do with a bit more detail in the other eye, it sa bit to dark. Well thats my opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
igord Posted September 22, 2003 Author Share Posted September 22, 2003 I will send next photo witout bikini top with my next visit... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edward_kang Posted September 22, 2003 Share Posted September 22, 2003 I don't agree with John that the high contrast look is in today. Most, if not all fashion portfolios and published photographs are low contrast and dramatic lighting. Looks like the fashion folks are getting picky about presentation as opposed to gimmicks. I think Igor's description of 'risky' is good. This photograph looks more overexposed than anything. Thought about retouching in photoshop to remove what looks like an obvious toe and shoulder problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twmeyer Posted September 22, 2003 Share Posted September 22, 2003 try exposing "properly" (for good highlight tone/detail) and then adjust levels in 16 bit to create this effect, thereby reducing the risk of wasting the photo session through over exposure... t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris auman archivingdigi Posted September 23, 2003 Share Posted September 23, 2003 Hello. This is a very basic question but what did you do to read your exposure on this? Did you read the shadows or the highlights? Is it an on camera meeter? Please let me know your thoughts on helping me to achieve the same results with consistancy. Thanks!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
igord Posted September 24, 2003 Author Share Posted September 24, 2003 Hi folks, I must tell you that original print is not overexposed, this picture changed its look after scanning, making jpeg and etc. The light is very soft and highest lights are OK. I measured with flash meter, average reading. I used 3 light sources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twmeyer Posted September 24, 2003 Share Posted September 24, 2003 3? I see two... where did you hide #3?... t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now