barry_kleinberg Posted August 8, 2003 Share Posted August 8, 2003 I have recently bought the great Sigma lense for the Canon Rebel 2000 (saving up for the 3!). Anyone had any experience of using the lense on non-digital bodies. I have read lots of reviews and they all seem to be mediocre on film cameras and great for digital bodies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catchlight Posted August 8, 2003 Share Posted August 8, 2003 <a href="http://www.rainbowtheatre.com/boathouse">Here's a page</a> I'm working on. The images were shot with an EOS3 and the Sigma 15-30mm.<p> I plan to play with the perspective in PS later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doreen_miller Posted August 8, 2003 Share Posted August 8, 2003 I have that lense and have used it with the Rebel 2000, Elan 7E and 10D and I think it does well on all. Enjoy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Former P.N Member Posted August 8, 2003 Share Posted August 8, 2003 Sigma 15-30 on an EOS-3 samples at <a href="http://casualphotos.vze.com/Web-Sigma15-30">casualphotos.vze.com/Web-Sigma15-30</a>. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kshearon Posted August 8, 2003 Share Posted August 8, 2003 I tried this lens for a few days on a D30, 1D, Elan IIe, and EOS 5. The AF snapped right in locking on out of focus every time. I sent it back. I suggest you shoot a test chart or some pattern that can show high definition and check for the detail. Then check AF and manual focus accuracy. Hope you got a better one than I got. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vincent_j_m Posted August 8, 2003 Share Posted August 8, 2003 I borrowed a 15-30 for a few weeks to test on my EOS-3. AF was good. The color balance was very warm. Colors were pretty saturated. The one thing which let it down was the sharpness. Center sharpness was OK, comparable to the 20-35 USM, but towards the edges the sharpness dropped. Points towards the periphery appeared squished out (smeared?). I wouldn't use this lens on a full frame SLR. On the whole, the Canon 20-35USM is a far better performer unless I *have* to have the 15mm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yakim_peled1 Posted August 10, 2003 Share Posted August 10, 2003 >> "I have read lots of reviews and they all seem to be mediocre on film cameras and great for digital bodies". The reason for this is simple. It's because this lens was specifically designed to work best with non-full-frame bodies (read: most DSLRs). The DG (read: digital) in it's name says so. It's designers scarified edge performance in order to reduce manufacturing costs, thus lowering its price for the final customer - you. When you use it like it was intended (i.e. with a non-full-frame DSLR), you get only the benefits - low price and good center performance - without suffering from its disadvantages. But all this technicalities are not really important. You use it with a full-frame body. You like it ("the great Sigma"). Go out, shoot and have fun. Happy shooting , Yakim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whayne_padden Posted August 10, 2003 Share Posted August 10, 2003 Sorry Yakim, what you say sounds good in theory but it is just not true in the real world. My 15-30 and my EOS 3 work wonderfully together. I rarely shoot the lens wide open as it is a landscape lens for me, but stopped down I get pin sharp pictures. It's a great lens for the money and doesn't give too much away to Canon's 17-40. Only annoying thing, can't really front mount filters without a lot of hassle and AF is typical Sigma sloooow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now