akajohndoe Posted July 26, 2003 Share Posted July 26, 2003 I got the 90mm to primarily do macro work. I've used it with tele-extenders, close-up filters, and tubes; however, the 65mm looks much more usable to me for pure macro work. I can rent one locally and probably will soon. I've never used the 90mm as a normal lens and have an 85/1.8 anyway which is close. Anyone worked with the 65mm? Other than not being able to go less than 1x I don't see a downside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akajohndoe Posted July 26, 2003 Author Share Posted July 26, 2003 By the way, I'm not trying to be mysterious with the asterisks. It's just that my firewall blanks out my name on non-secure (i.e.: not HTTPS) sites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobatkins Posted July 26, 2003 Share Posted July 26, 2003 If you give me the name you want, I'll change it for you on the system so it displays properly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_goldman Posted July 27, 2003 Share Posted July 27, 2003 Check out this recent thread for reference to a fellow who uses the MP-E 65mm macro lens for insect photography and has a detailed description of the 65mm and how he uses it. It's a great tool but may be too specialized for your needs. http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=005aaS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yakim_peled1 Posted July 27, 2003 Share Posted July 27, 2003 <P> Some users can be found <a href="http://www.photographyreview.com/35mm,Primes/Canon,MP-E,65mm,f-2.8,Macro/PRD_84959_3111crx.aspx">here</a> and <a href="http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=46&sort=7&thecat=2">here</a>. </P> <P> Happy shooting , <br> Yakim. </P> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobias_mennle Posted July 27, 2003 Share Posted July 27, 2003 You could also get a Zeiss 63mm luminar or Leica or even cheaper Olympus or Canon FD Equivalent and use it with the Zoerk Multifocus System. The great thing is you can tilt up to 30° or so which is priceless in extreme macrophotography. It´s probably not as easy to use as the Canon, but a really clever system. Working with 65mm larger than 1:1 is very very hard in the field, not much working distance and the smallest breeze will destroy your composition. It´s really something for the determined; I´d rather get the 180 macro plus 2x Extender and extension tubes. Much easier to work with. A lot of downsides here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oliver_s. Posted July 28, 2003 Share Posted July 28, 2003 Unless I'm completely mistaken, the MP-E 65mm offers electronic diaphragm control like EF and TS-E lenses, so you can compose and focus with the lens wide open. Not that f/2.8 were much at 1:1 scale, but it's still a lot better than f/16. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now