Jump to content

What makes a good Landscape shot?


travis1

Recommended Posts

>>>Politics. Landscapes are most interesting when they have something to say about

man's impact on his world....There's nothing that annoys me more than a nice virgin

landscape picture.<<<

 

Hey, not everything is politics! There are some virgin landscapes...and to say that they

cannot be photographed without making a political statement is just to bury your

head in the sand in another way. The only thing is to be able to keep the picture from

being trite. Don't forget you can be just as trite making a political statement. So shall

I say, "trite is as trite does"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Trevor,

<p>

We didn't really made our land out of the sea. As the medieval Dutchmen cleared the forests of the Rhine-delta moors and made ditches and canals to drain their fields-to-be, the boggy soil lost its water and the landlevel sunk below sea level.

<br>

Since then we needed to built dikes and polders - although after this long hot summer we actually ran out of water...

<p>

Most landscapes are deeply influenced by men - maybe that is why we like 'really untouched landscapes'.

<p>

E.g. Scotland is by a lot of people thought of as a unspoilt landscape. This is far from the truth, very far. The landscape is just beautiful and there are not that many inhabitants.

<p>

The Netherlands are densely populated, but medieval dikes and modern polders are a good subject to photograph - although it is not really my thing.

<p>

<a href="http://www.fotografiewimvanvelzen.nl">Wim</a>

<p>

<img src='http://www.fotografiewimvanvelzen.nl/images/lrivi090598-09.jpg' alt='Lexmond, the Netherlands' width= '427' height='418' />

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the great 'virgin' landscapes of earth....

 

Sahara. Once lush and green and farmed millenia ago. (Bronze age around 2500 BC)

 

Greenland. Once lush and green (hence the name) and farmed. (Vikings)

 

Himalayas. Strewn with thousands of items of human litter including oxygen tanks, human waste, cooking implements and bodies of deceased mountaineers.

 

Amazon rainforests. Have been 'managed' and lived in by the indigenous tribes for thousands of years. Only 'virgin' to western eyes.

 

Pacific Ocean. Littered with millions of cheap training shoes after various shipping accidents. (Training shoes hardly ever sink.) These are now being tracked by oceanographers and meteorologists concerned about the changing pacific currents.

 

Politics / economics / conquest / foot fashion / climate change. There is NO true wilderness out there. Even deep under the Sahara you will find Bronze age farms. (Maybe even the odd Nike shoe!)

 

The whole of recorded human history back to the time of the ancient city of Ur (and beyond) has all occurred during a 'tea-break' in the current ice age. Lets photograph it, virgin or not, before it all reverts back to icy white.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wim. Very much the same way that the Norfolk fenlands came to be. Ancient farmers in the midlands cleared forest and farmed it. The soil that drained away as a result built up the level of the seabed around Norfolk and flooded wetlands came about. English and Dutch engineers have spent 400 years keeping it drained as rich farmland.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many colours does the wind have?

 

The answer to your question could be: The photographer�s

interpretation.( of the Creators work )

I strongly urge you to use all your senses. Film, camera and all

the gear + teknik etc, is just a choice you make ( and have to

master) to communicate what you sense out there in nature.

When John Blakemore (UK) first showed me his B/W picture of

wind, I could HEAR the wind in his picture. (also printed in his

book: Inscape)

-

Yes, it is nice to please the eye with a nice or wow picture,- but

who wants nice, when you can have or look at a picture, that can

touch you on a deep mystical level?

 

Yukaze ya

 

shirabara no hana

 

mina ugoku.

 

Ann Stella

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am thankful to have found the best professional landscape photography book that I've run across - "First Light" by the British 4x5 photographer Joe Cornish. In my humble opinion, Joe's work has no professional peer in terms of outstanding landscape photography. His web site and gallery can be found as follows:

www.joecornish.com/about/about.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like good and great music, photographs , landscapes need emotional, aesthetic &

intellectual

"hooks". The viewer has to be stimulated emotionally,

intrigued by the formal visual qualities (light, composition, framing, color (or black &

white tonalities); and provoked to think about what they are seeing as they look at the

image. Weakness in any one of these areas will sabotage the image.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wim,

 

"As the medieval Dutchmen cleared the forests of the Rhine-delta moors and made ditches and canals to drain their fields-to-be, the boggy soil lost its water and the landlevel sunk below sea level."

 

Not entirely true, after we used up all the wood we exploited the boggs to heat our houses untill we nearly drowned, then we used windmills so we could dig even deeper. They dont call us flying dutchmen for nothing ;))

 

Greetings,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're going to list books, some good recent landscape books:

 

Fuji, by Chris Steele Perkins

http://www.foto8.com/reviews/fuji.html

 

Chronotopia, Simon Norfolk

http://www.dewilewispublishing.com/PHOTOGRAPHY/Simon_Norfolk.html

 

A Way into India, Raghubir Singh

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0714842117/

 

Once, Wim Wenders

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/1891024256/

 

Wim Wenders uses a Leica w/ 28 and a medium format, forgot which one, Steele

Perkins has a big Fuji medium-format panoramic, but some of the shots might be

with M6+35f1.4 pre-asph, Simon Norfolk used a view camera. Odd, out of 4

landscape books, 3 are by Europeans, but none are shot in Europe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I've never even attempted to take a decent landcape shot in my life. I wouldnt know how to! And although I enjoy looking at landscape photos, a lot of the time they are just that little bit too technical and not quite emotional enough. The only exception up until fifteen minutes ago were the Don McCullin shots mentioned by Trevor (which I believe were slated in the press).<br><br>

 

"So what happened fifteen minutes ago?" you ask (or not). Well I ran across this: <a href="http://www.magnumphotos.com/c/htm/Pa.aspx?&E=A_2TYRYDWHN7XJ">"Shorelines" by Harry Gruyaert.</a> Some of the most glorious colours ive ever seen and thats only on my monitor. If only I could afford the book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...