felix_erazo Posted May 29, 2003 Share Posted May 29, 2003 Thanks for your feedback guy�s. I just got back from Leica and they told me that one of the M�s is so badly jammed that they couldn�t un- jam it quickly to see what the problem is. David said that he would have to open the body to see what the problem is. The other M, needs a new film transport and a overall CLA. Overall damage is $750.00 The puzzling thing is that both cameras were working fine till the hour before leaving Puerto Rico. I even prematurely rewound one of the rolls because I didn�t want the film going thru the x-ray machine. I packed The M�s in my bag. With body caps and all. The other thing that might have possibly done it, and again this is a long shot... Both M�s had soft-releases on, and maybe with a little pressure in the carry bag, the soft-release pressuring the shutter, the shutter�s might have gotten jammed. Other than that? Who knows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jongraham1 Posted May 29, 2003 Share Posted May 29, 2003 A long shot, but perhaps the soft release had something to do with it. For the hell of it, I removed my soft release the other day and immediately had problems with the shutter release: it would not press smoothly and made a slight grinding sound. After about 20-30 presses, it was back to normal. No more soft releases for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay_. Posted May 29, 2003 Share Posted May 29, 2003 Felix, you weren't shooting near the beach (or staying someplace near the beach, with open windows) in Puerto Rico were you? Other than long years of hard use or impact, the only other things that really jam up and waste the film transport are sand and salt. The only way the soft release could cause real damage is if the camera were dropped or hit on the soft release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephane_park Posted May 29, 2003 Share Posted May 29, 2003 Sorry to hear of your problems...I remember, I knew someone that dropped their camera bag (actually it more or less rolled - the height was that of one stair step or so), got the softrelease jammed all the way in and had to get major repairs done...I was also using the softreleases (I really did like to feel better) but upon seeing that incident, they are now off permanently.. I guess I am just a coward... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_wills Posted May 29, 2003 Share Posted May 29, 2003 Ouch. Boy, that's tough luck Felix. I suffered a shutter jam about a year ago with an M-6 classic and had to have an otherwise unneeded CLA. I can't remember if I was using a soft release at the time but you guys have got me a little worried about using it now . After the CLA, my shutter was adjusted so sweet that I feel I can take or leave the soft release now, although I do think it helps on the really slows shutter speeds. Anywho, let us know if you solve the mystery. Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a._j._valys Posted May 29, 2003 Share Posted May 29, 2003 Come on now folks, there is no way that the soft release can interfere with the operation of the shutter release bitton. The soft release is pushing on the same part that your finger would be pressing on were the soft release not there. If you feel grinding or whatever, you would feel it without the soft release. The only way that the soft release could become an aid to damage to the button would be, like the man said, for the camera to fall directly on the softie. And that would take some extreme bad luck. Regards, Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott squire nonfiction Posted May 29, 2003 Share Posted May 29, 2003 Tony,I beg to differ. While I've not had Felix's bad luck, it's clear to me that the Softie's diameter allows a user to put a side load on the shutter release that would be tough to do with your finger alone. If one consistently uses one edge, the release is probably riding up and down against one side of its channel, no? Who knows, maybe gunk can build up on the opposite side of the channel, then get wiggled loose enough to jam up in the course of the flight. Now, I'm not intimitely familiar with the mechanism, but it seems that with general (if not specific) regard to this discussion, the soft release clearly can do stuff a finger by itself cannot. Incidentally I just had a discussion with Sherry K about airplane-frequency vibrations and their effect on cameras--seems she's pretty convinced that they make trouble for M users routinely. I'm inclined to err on the side of caution. Cheers, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandy. Posted May 29, 2003 Share Posted May 29, 2003 Scott and Felix, Now isn't that interesting!?!? So it doesn't seem like I pull a fast one on you guys, ha? Well, next time, don't shoot the messenger so quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin m. Posted May 29, 2003 Share Posted May 29, 2003 No offense, but you have to take what Sherry says with a grain of salt. If you listen to her, no Leica after the M5 is worth owning. Amazing any pictures have been successfully taken with the damned things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now