Jump to content

Nikkor 24-85 AF-S G: Great Lens


david enzel

Recommended Posts

I just bought this lens and just tested it. I really love it. I

shot a roll of Provia 400. The lens is very sharp and compares well

with the 28-70 f2.8 -- except for the speed of course. The AF is

fast and the lens is very light. The manual focus option -- even

with AF -- is nice. If you can live with a slower lens this lens is

just wonderful. I like shooting in this focal range and tend to be

at f8 as often as possible. This lens on the F100 is a wonderful and

verstaile combination that is light on the shoulder and reasonable on

the pocket book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've only heard good things (optically) about the 24-85 though the very odd 67mm

diameter proves to be a barrier for myself. I'm looking forward to the 24-120 AFS VR

f 3.5-5.6 as it is supposed to be optically similar to the 24-85mm in fact it seems

like the 24-120 is more like a second generation 24-85 (the inexpensive AFS,

cosmetics, focal range).

 

How does it (the 24-85mm) handle dim conditions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To respond:

 

The lens handles dim situations very well with my F100 and focuses quickly.

 

I have not noticed a problem with straight lines and included this in my test.

 

The odd filter size is a drawback, I agree. I will be interested to see the 24-120 but doubt I will buy it. the 24-85 is so small and light and I don't often use filters for what I do. I generally put a UV filter on for protection and leave it at that. From time to time I use a polarizer and would probably choose a different lens because I have a 77mm polarizer.

 

I would welcome other reactions to this new lens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a fine lens. I have it as well as the 28-70 AF-S. When I want to travel light, I bring the 24-85. As it has been discussed recently, some barrel distortion is not a big deal in most situations; unless you have some straight lines near the edge of the image as reference points, distortion is not noticable.

 

I have a 77-to-67 step down ring to use my 77mm filters on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also am waiting for the new 24-120 VR. I'm just worried that the distortion will be really pronounced at the wide end which makes me hesitant to pay over $500.00. Maybe I'm better off getting a 28-105 and a fixed 24mm. Have any of you thought of this? I mainly shoot landscapes and nature so a fast lense is not an issue.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope it's better than the 28-80G, and it would almost have to be. I agree with a previous poster who said the barrel distortion with that lens was laughable. I would add the pincushion distortion as well. It made it totally unusable for anything but snapshots, as far as I'm concerned. I'm lucky I was able to get rid of it and the 70-300G, although I feel bad for the poor guy who ends up with them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...