Mark Keefer Posted November 24, 2018 Share Posted November 24, 2018 I came across this article. Link. Sony isn't making it easy for the other camera manufacturers to catch up. I think by raising the bar this high they are going to entice even more photographers to switch camps and upgrade and recreate the success of the A7RIII. 1 Cheers, Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodeo_joe1 Posted November 24, 2018 Share Posted November 24, 2018 At last! A bit-depth in full-frame to compete with so-called medium format cameras. Or so it's rumoured. I really don't know why it's taken this long. 16 bit A/D converters have been common currency in mainstream electronics for decades. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted November 25, 2018 Share Posted November 25, 2018 8K video? I'm not ready for 4Kp60 except for demonstration purposes. You get only 2.5 hours of 4K, 4,2,2 8-bit, DNxHD 220 video on a 1 TB drive. RAW video is something else indeed, at least twice the data rate you can handle on an HDMI interface, with special connectors and cables. Actually there are quite a few cameras with cinematic RAW video output, including Canon C300 (and up), Black Magic, and (naturally) Red. Still, it seems over the top for what one should expect from a part-time video camera. Things will change, old challenges will vanish and new ones emerge. I remember paying over $1K for a 2G hard drive for editing and burning CDs about 20 years ago. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Keefer Posted November 25, 2018 Author Share Posted November 25, 2018 8K video? I'm not ready for 4Kp60 ... Still, it seems over the top for what one should expect from a part-time video camera. I hear you. Hard to keep up. Storage is still a challenge for me. Perhaps YouTube will be doing 8K some time. Hopefully the price of very large SSD drives will drop and we can get a 100 TB SSD in our laptops sometime in the next decade. lol. But I am still seeing 250 GB and 500 GB and a couple 1 TB SSD being sold under $200. It has been like this for a number of years now. Something has to give soon. Maybe overkill video for the average hobbyist , but it might be nice to know is there if you want to use it, :). I sure will appreciate 60 megapixel resolution for photography, but I have to say 42 megapixel is pretty good. Cheers, Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted November 25, 2018 Share Posted November 25, 2018 (edited) YouTube apparently peaks at a bandwidth of about 16 Mb/s. All the pixels will be displayed, 4K, possibly 8K (no examples yet), but the video is compressed to stay within that bandwidth. I format my deliverables for 720p, 1080p and 4K (3840) at 6, 8, and 32 Mb/s respectively. At midwestern data rates, it can take the better part of a day to upload a couple hours of 4K. Needless to say, I don't do that often. I just ordered a couple more Samsung 1 TB SSD's for under $130 each. That's commodity level pricing. I get the internal versions, and put them in $5 enclosures styled for use in an Atomos Ninja video recorder/monitor, with the bare connector accessible. I have a USB C reader, or simply use a USB cable with a SATA III connector at one end. Edited November 25, 2018 by Ed_Ingold 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodeo_joe1 Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 Cab they take out the (useless - nothing to view it on) 8K video and do a model a bit cheaper for me please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now