attilio_dp Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 I'm afraid I already know the answer but I thought I would ask the pros. Will this lens give full coverage on a 8x10 camera? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_salomon Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellis_vener_photography Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Like Bob said. No, at least not at infinity. At 1:2 or closer, maybe. But it will just cover 5x7 at infinity focus.It is a terrific lens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
attilio_dp Posted June 22, 2016 Author Share Posted June 22, 2016 <p>crap ok anyone want to buy a mint lens cheap? Otherwise I guess eBay it is.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhbebb Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 <p>You may or may not be aware that the standard wide-angle focal length for 8x10 is 165 mm, with 120 mm lenses being just usable with no movements. 8 x 10 coverage from a 90 mm lens is just too ambitious.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_l3 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 <p>I tried my 90mm F4.5 Nikkor on 8x10. It did not cover it, not even close. My 120mm Nikkor just barely does. Here is the 90mm Nikkor 4.5 image. It was impossible to keep the front bed out of the frame. </p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
attilio_dp Posted June 23, 2016 Author Share Posted June 23, 2016 Wow ok that photo says it all. Thanks everyone for the input. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sergio_ortega7 Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 <p>As already stated, the 120mm Nikkor SW barely covers 8x10 with zero movements, though it's a good choice for the panoramic 4x10 format. The 150mm Nikkor SW covers 8x10 with movements, and it's about as wide as most want to go with 8x10.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_fromm2 Posted June 25, 2016 Share Posted June 25, 2016 <p>Hmm. Nikon claims that the lens covers 154 mm at f/4.5, 235 mm at f/22,</p> <p>David, your shot was taken with the lens off center. What aperture did you shoot it at?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_l3 Posted June 25, 2016 Share Posted June 25, 2016 <p>Dan, it was at f16. I just examined the negative and there is a thin zone of unsharpness at the outer edge inside the exposed area. Probably explains why lens manufacturers understate the coverage of a lens, not just the cone of light, but also where sharpness and contrast are acceptable. It was a good exercise to make that negative. I learned the limits of my lens in a detailed way. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
attilio_dp Posted June 27, 2016 Author Share Posted June 27, 2016 <p>Well thanks guys. I went with a Nikon sw 120. Man I hate eBay. Advertised as being is great shape and working properly. HOWEVER I noticed the aperture ring slides so easy, too easy. The slightest touch and it moves across the aperture range. Now the return process.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now