Jump to content

Planning to explore 'Macro' this summer


Recommended Posts

<p>I just played with a 200 f2.8 and 25 and 50mm tube on my old Panasonic G1 with an adapter. This gives instant feedback. In general I found the following</p>

<p>1 The focus distance is a bit long for macro - since the minimum focusing distance is 1.5 meters<br>

2 The IQ is pretty poor - even stopped down to F8. Below this it deteriorates a lot.</p>

<p>This was just a quick test but the results were pretty bad</p>

<p>Here are two test shots - using a tripod but without a full lighting or putting the focusing rail on.</p><div>00ccds-548785784.jpg.a956d830349b72be8908f68d6b6b0096.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>This one is taken of I magazine I propped up. the fact it goes OOF is more to do with the curve of the magazine page than the lens. Not bad but this combination is hard to set up and use and with film may well be very limited by light and speed.</p><div>00ccdt-548785884.jpg.c7eaed8a3cf29c07a14f8f8dbd703634.jpg</div>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

200/4 Macro hard to find & still in the $400 range. I used a Viv S1 90-180 Flat Field lens as it gives a

more variable distance & magnification range. In combination with the very sharp Viv S1 90/2.5

Macro,which can be used as a normal lens, all macro bases covered. 50 Macro sharp but usable distance

for macro way too short for my applications. Currently using both on EOS with original Canon FD/EOS

adapter on EOS bodies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Thanks for going to all that trouble Philip...<br>

I also experimented with a FD50 extension tube on FD 85 / 135 / 200 primes, and then the 50-135 / 70-150 zooms. So right at this point...(just using a glass of flowers on the kitchen counter)...I came away liking the Extension Tube + 70-150 zoom a lot.<br /><br /> It seemed to have a good moderate working distance from the subject and the ability to tweak an overall zone of focus with the zoom rather than repositioning the tripod...plus, I already knew its IQ / color rendition was excellent from a lot of close-up flower shots at a local Arboretum last year so I may have a starting point.<br>

It's still very early on the learning curve, but I think what I have will work for some halfway decent beginner macros.<br />(And if an FD 200/4 Macro should fall into my lap at an affordable price.....well) </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I have the fd 200 f4 macro and almost always use on tripod, and these days mostly on eos or u4/3 via adaptor. I also have the fd 50 macro and it is a nice lens. I actually shot my sisters outdoor wedding on the 50 macro years ago. I do like the 100macro but my experience is limited to the EF version.</p>

<p>i see the fd 100 macro at keh for less than $140</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I appreciate all that info as well.<br>

So, in spite of "the best laid plans of mice and men to just make do with what I already had"...if you guys get a moment, take a peek at each of these. 100% positive rating, return policy, includes shipping, seems like a pretty good price and pretty low risk.<br>

(Scroll down a screen or so to the main item)<br>

http://www.ebay.com/itm/141306155069?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1497.l2649<br>

http://www.ebay.com/itm/111371878283?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1497.l2649</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Bill I have the 100 Macro and it is a good lens. The only reason that I suggest you also consider the 50 is that it is cheap and very sharp. If you need to shoot from longer ranges then the 100 or 200 would also be necessary.</p>

<p>Keh has an EX 50 macro with extension tube for $65 and the 100 for $139 - plus the extension tube for about $8. KEH EX is usually very good and a safer option than ebay.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v630/roundball/PHOTOGRAPHY/FLOWERS/PetuniaFD100mm40Macro_28402M_zps86cb766a.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="533" /><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v630/roundball/PHOTOGRAPHY/FLOWERS/PetuniaFD100mm40Macro_28402MCropped_zpsdc19f8f8.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="485" /></p>

<p>The FD 100/4.0 Macro just arrived...stepped out and took a couple hasty test shots on a monopod to know if it even worked or not. Hanging basket of Petunias had a very slight sway in the breeze, tried to time the shots when it had swung to a stopping / reversal point, LOL.<br>

Shot it native, no tube... 1st photo is original...2nd photo is cropped up to see how the detail looked and the little grains of pollen seem sharp...and the background is incredibly smooth. Lens looks like new, everything seems to work, will learn more about macro lenses and techniques as I get into it deeper this summer.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p><strong>Wow…additional test shots using FD 50 extension tube and tripod.<br /></strong><strong>This $99 Canon FD 100/4.0 Macro lens is very sharp picking up detail…I never even saw the single drop of dew at the bottom of the left hand ‘anther’ looking through the lens…only after I cropped it up...definitely a keeper.</strong><strong><br /></strong><br>

<strong><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v630/roundball/PHOTOGRAPHY/FLOWERS/060614FD100mm40MacroExt50_zpsdfc4daf7.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="533" /><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v630/roundball/PHOTOGRAPHY/FLOWERS/060614FD100mm40MacroExt50Cropped_zps0f0b06ad.jpg" alt="" /></strong></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>In experimenting to see just how much detail was there if I cropped it up even further, I discovered that what I thought was a drop of dew was actually one of the tiny micro sized small petals on that 'anther'.</p>

<p><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v630/roundball/PHOTOGRAPHY/FLOWERS/060614FD100mm40MacroExt50SUPERCropped_zps0ceac9f8.jpg" alt="" /></p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Wow Bill that was fast, you must live close to Atlanta. Congrats on the lenses. Be careful though, you'll soon find yourself wanting an FD Autobellows or some kind of slide rail....have fun...</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>The 50 Macro arrived today...those last two shots I posted are using it. I also took a couple casual snapshots across the backyard and it does great as a regular 50mm lens to...as does the 100. Zero complaints for a couple of like new specialty lenses for very little money.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v630/roundball/PHOTOGRAPHY/FLOWERS/060914LiliumKentucky_023Cropped_zpse98f7534.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="520" /><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v630/roundball/PHOTOGRAPHY/FLOWERS/060914BumbleBeeonEchinaceaSunrise_161Cropped_zps3983592a.jpg" alt="" /><br /> <img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v630/roundball/PHOTOGRAPHY/FLOWERS/060914Sunflowerfamily-WaterDropBumbleBeeonflower_053_zpsee573b1c.jpg" alt="" /></p>

 

<p ><strong>Took the Canon FD 100/4.0 Macro on a 3 hour "macro field trip" at a local University Arboretum and really tested it in a target rich environment...to say that it looks new / performed like new is an understatement...it is simply outstanding. Here are just a few quick examples:</strong></p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

<p ><strong>Right after a raging thunderstorm I got a chance to try out the Canon FD 50mm / 3.5 Macro I recently picked up...between showers, no time for a tripod…thought it turned out OK.</strong></p>

<p ><strong> </strong></p>

<p ><strong><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v630/roundball/PHOTOGRAPHY/FLOWERS/061914CanonFD50mm35MacroAfterT-storm_08AC_zps825e4a84.jpg" alt="" /></strong></p>

<p ><strong> </strong></p>

<p > </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...