Dave Luttmann Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Warren, wet prints look different than inkjet. And the OP has expressed his desire for wet prints. The opinion piece from you isn't relevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ondebanks Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 <p>Dave,</p> <blockquote> <p>Warren, wet prints look different than inkjet. And the OP has expressed his desire for wet prints. The opinion piece from you isn't relevant.</p> </blockquote> <p>But the opinion piece which Warren was directly responding to - where the OP (Karl Hopper) deviated from his original reasonable question to unreasonably attack inkjets in general (it was he who introduced the pejorative term "crap" to this thread) - that <em>is</em> relevant? You are not being fair on Warren, who had every right to counter this.</p> <p>Anyway, Karl's later reply to Warren was more nuanced and essentially accepting of his point, so I don't see why you even felt the need to step in to police things. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now