User_4754088 Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 <p>I have to shoot digital for work because everyone wants everything "yesterday". But I got a chance to get out and shoot for myself this morning, just me and my F-1 and a bevy of primes.</p><p>What an absolute joy to shoot this camera. So simple. The lenses feel so good in your hands, they focus so silky smooth (28mm f2, 50mm f1.2L, 100mm f2, 135mm f2.5) and the controls couldn't be more straightforward. And I love NOT being able to chimp between shots. </p><p>And it's also fun sending the film off for development and waiting for it to come back, as opposed to immediately throwing the images up on computer and having to instantaneously fine adjust them and decide which ones to send to the editor.</p><p>It was very ZEN.</p><p>Best,<br>-Tim</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Member69643 Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 <p>I don't think Canon made a single bad FD camera before 1982 or so. After that things got murky. :) I enjoy my F-1 and AE-1P quite a bit. </p> <p>Nice when you can take a step away from the computer for a bit!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 <p>I miss slides - especially Kodachrome slides - but some B&W and color negative films are very nice, and do convert nicely into digital images.</p> <p>Some of those old Kodachromes in digital form look really nice on a huge monitor in hi-res.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_4754088 Posted March 6, 2014 Author Share Posted March 6, 2014 <p>JDM, totally agree about slide film. Shot truckloads of Kodak Ektachrome EPP-100 back in the 1990's. Really miss that film. Never warmed up much to the Fuji slide film. And I certainly miss Kodachrome, but hadn't shot any of that in decades.</p> <p>Funny, I always found the FD glass did magical things to Ektachrome. I could never get the same results with Nikon glass, weird.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed_k__north_carolina_ Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 <p>"Momma, they took my Kodachrome away" I miss Kodachrome so much. It is hard to find local processors for slides and it's becoming tougher to find decent C-41. Been shooting mostly B&W developing it myself and scanning it.</p> <p>I too have rekindled the joy of my FD glass on my original FD bodies (EF, FTb and FTbn) along with F-1, F-1n and New F-1. All the F-1s were purchased over the last 2 or 3 years along the A series bodies.</p> <p>Even though I owned a brand new New F-1 and sold it in the early 90's; I found the original F-1 to be a new favorite.</p> <p>Ed</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_4754088 Posted March 6, 2014 Author Share Posted March 6, 2014 <p>I made the huge mistake of selling most of my Canon FD kit back in 1996 and switching to Nikon. Although my Nikon gear pays the bills, I truly miss my pristine F-1n, and the bevy of lenses I sold along with it.</p> <p>Using a NEW F-1 these days, mostly because I can get the batteries still, and I've got the matte, spot meter Focusing Screen, which I dearly love. </p> <p>On the lookout for a pristine F-1n to go with my Motor Drive MF (sp), though it may end up being a shelf queen as I am starting to really like this NEW F-1.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 <p>It's truly amazing how inexpensive some very fine FD-series camera bodies in good shape are these days. Some of the old top end ones are a little more, but still often much cheaper than a new point-and-shoot digital camera.<br> The same goes for film EOS cameras too, so there's no need to stop shooting film. :)</p> <p>Lenses are a little more pricey, especially for the older cameras that use still in service lens mount lenses. Of course the smaller digital cameras that take almost any lens have also had some impact even on the "orphaned" lenses.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walter_degroot Posted March 7, 2014 Share Posted March 7, 2014 <p>i OWN a selection of a and t series fd cameras..<br> when spring comes I look forward to using themn.<br> I can still see well enough to frame and focus.<br> rweading a graduate or thermometer may be harder though.<br> My son is agaisst the use of film and thinks any use or desire to use any film camera is stupid.</p> <p>One of my problems is seeing those darn little numbers.<br> But I will start with the T50. .</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_4754088 Posted March 7, 2014 Author Share Posted March 7, 2014 <p>Yes, as the eyes age it does get more difficult. I have finally succumbed to using a diopter on my FD bodies. The diopters are getting really hard to find, but bring back the joy of shooting with these gems. Also carry a pair of reading glasses in case I need to read the frame counter, that or I just shoot until I can't advance the film anymore. :-)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lou_Meluso Posted March 7, 2014 Share Posted March 7, 2014 <p>I don't miss film, but I do miss that solid feel of the F-1n, the simplicity and precision of it's operation and all the fine FD lenses that sit in front. Though mine is in retirement I don't have the heart to part with such a fine machine. Perhaps, like you, I'll pull it out again someday for bit of F-1 fun. Fortunately, my quiver of FD lenses is finding new life with my Sony digicams so my decades long association with Canon FD gear shall continue.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mukul_dube Posted March 7, 2014 Share Posted March 7, 2014 <p>After having them for thirty years I sold my FTbN and EF, three FD lenses and one FL lens, chiefly because of problems with vision. I ran a Leica range-finder system at the same time, and that was much easier to focus. Diopters were hard to find even in the early years of this century.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_pierlot Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 <p>As much as I enjoy shooting with my T90 and 1V, my F-1's (original, later, and New) have that solidity of feel and simplicity and precision of operation to which Louis alludes that can't be matched by the newer electronic bodies.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_janes Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 These are still my favorite cameras to use, especially the earlier mechanical versions: from an elegantly simple shell, unique sensations of precision and battle readiness. I would not trade mine for anyone else's ANYTHING! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_waller Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 <p>I love the F1. So much so that I have four of them, of varying ages and conditions. The F1 was, to my mind, Canon's last 'real' camera.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_4136860 Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 <p>I have three Canon New F1 AE's and truly believe they are the best professional manual focus S.L.R.'s ever made.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_janes Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 <p><img src="/bboard/dscf0680.jpg" alt="" />Okay.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_janes Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 <p>Now.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_4754088 Posted March 10, 2014 Author Share Posted March 10, 2014 <p>Rick, I'm <em>green</em> with envy.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_5050610 Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 <p>Rick--a beauty! I've seen pictures of those, but never knew the history. Were they for the military?<br> Thanks!<br> Paul</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_janes Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Paul, they were a Japan-only market item (all the paperwork which came with mine is in Japanese) and its special limited-edition olive green finish was intended to renew consumer interest in the F-1n which by then was several years old. The camera was not made specifically for military service but I'd imagine that many were purchased by individuals of military background. To me, it is a pity that Canon did not produce some lenses of matching finish...perhaps someday I will have one painted myself! But the most beautiful thing about them is they're 100% an F-1...and a more reliable friend you shall never find! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_5050610 Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 <p>Thanks for the info, Rick--it IS a beauty!<br> Paul</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_janes Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Took a closer look at the ODF-1's included literature / price list and noted that it cost the exact same as a standard F-1n, 104,000¥. Tim, echoing what you said about the Zen-like process of using film and having to actually WAIT for something...and it's actually pleasurable to stroll down to our local (and now only!) camera shop and gab with Peggy, her staff and other customers...in person, face to face, socializing! I quite surprised at how many people still come in with film cameras, to buy and drop off film. Yeah, I am an odd bird but not totally so! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven_endo Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 <p>Yeah, and back then there was no gouging either. I almost bought one, at the ¥104,000, but (regrettably, to this day) decided against it since the duty would have doubled the price...</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_4754088 Posted March 12, 2014 Author Share Posted March 12, 2014 <p>Rick, don't know if there is any such thing as a Leica R to Canon FD adapter, but Leica made a series of their SLR lenses (R series) in the olive drab/green color. Went with a special Leica R camera body, though I can't remember which one. Think they called it the "Safari" or something like that.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennis_kushner2 Posted March 14, 2014 Share Posted March 14, 2014 The R to FD adapter is rare & manufacture unknown. Found one about 10 years ago. Leica had both R & M Safari versions in green. Every so often a R-FD adapter from China appears on eBay. Don't recall seller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now