Jump to content

"Punchy" Lenses


leon8

Recommended Posts

Just reading through various threads, I hear about certain lenses

which are decribed as having extraordinary "punch" - which I take to

mean high contrast color rendition and sharp resolution. I often hear

the Nikkor 105/2.5 described to be punchy as George Foreman. I have

the 105/2.5, and I have always been pleased by the results. I was

just wondering what other lenses out there people feel have this

punch...

 

I hear that the new 45mm Tessar has just as much "punch". I also

suspect that the 180/2.8 has a mean punch. What other lenses do you

think fit in this special catergory? And I do not just mean merely

sharp - for instance, I have the 50/1.8 and it is just as sharp as my

105/2.5, but the 105/2.5 just has something that the 50/1.8 does

not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never heard it described thusly,usually its called snap or crispness.Most of the manual focus,fixed focal Nikkors(AI or NON AI) have "it" though.In no particular order Ive always loved the following:24mm f2.8,28mm F2.8,35mm F2,50mm f1.4,85mm f1.8,105mm f2.5,135mm f2.8,180mm f2.8.In certain light these lenses have that "Nikon" glow,which always looked best in Kodachrome!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colin,

I have the same lens and recently went to see about AI'ing it.

The cost of using the original Nikon rings is about 80 USD, doign it manually

by removing material (without adding the numbers) is about 20USD.

Any suggestions on which comes out better, in the sense of whioch one

produces better photographic results?

Thanks

 

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tim,

 

The conversion on my 20/3.5 Nikkor-UD seems to be the proper job but was already done when I bought it. My Nikkor-UD is one of my favorite lenses with great peformance for foreground and medium range but to be fair tending to be just a little soft a infinity compared with later Nikkors. Probably worth the cost though if the glass etc is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like my Nikkors but if any carried Big George's punch I'm not sure I'd want to be within striking distance.

 

What I notice with my Nikkors, compared with the Canon FD and Olympus Zuikos I've used before, I somewhat higher contrast and slightly harsh bokeh. The contast is no problem with good color negative films like NPS, NPH, etc., but I have to be careful with slide films like Provia 100F to keep highlights in balance. With slower b&w films I've had to make some adjustments to my familiar routines for exposure and processing to accomodate this characteristic.

 

Resolution is definitely good - my Nikkors have a wider sweet spot than some other lenses I've owned. Of course I didn't compromise in my selection of Nikkors, while I had to with the Canon FD gear I used to use.

 

I guess my best Nikkors are a 50/2 AI and 180/2.8 pre-AI, non-ED. Extraordinarily versatile for fairly humble lenses; very responsive to different films.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...