MF digital options...

[sunny_alan_alan]

<p><br /> </p>

<p>I have a choice of below two sets of gear, landscape and art copying are the need. (No big budget...)<br /> Which is better and why please, or any alternative options, thanks in advance....<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> MF systems:<br /> 1. Betterlight Super 6K HS 4x5 Digital Scanback @ $ 5000 + <br /> Cambo Master Plus 4X5 View Camera ........... $ 1000<br /> Schneider 80mm f5.6 Macro-Digitar …………… $ 800<br /> (aka Macro-Symmar MC Copal ) <br /> +shipping, duty. Total……….$ 8000<br /> <br /> <br /> Or<br /> 2. Leaf Aptus II-65 Digital Back – <br /> No much used. Clean sensor.<br /> Hasselblad 500 CM+HB 100mm, 80 mm Lens<br /> With pistol grip,Extn. Rings, shade, wires…etc<br /> Original Box….. Total $ 7000<br>

</p>

[ondebanks]

<p>Are you aware of the limitations of scanning backs? The subject must be absolutely motionless through the duration of the scan (many seconds). That limits its use in many landscape situations (wind-blown trees and grass, moving water, clouds, animals, people, traffic...).</p>

<p>Also the scanback can only be operated tethered to a computer. That's a bit awkward for landscape. The Aptus is self-contained and hand-holdable. </p>

<p>Beyond that, you have the usual view camera vs SLR camera issues to weigh up; such as control vs. convenience.</p>

[brian yarvin]

<p>Tough question! To me, it looks like the scanning back is far better for art repro and the Leaf for outdoors.</p>

<p>I would also suggest a longer lens for the scanning back, I did well with a 135.</p>

[Aoresteen]

<p>I'd consider getting a good 6x7 or 6x9 camera and a Nikon CoolScan 9000 film scanner. Shoot Fuji E-6 and then scan it.</p>

[mike_earussi1]

<p>Why not just do pano stitching with a regular dslr? I do all of my landscapes and copy work this way and they turn out great. Minimum cost, you just have to learn the necessary techniques to do it right.</p>