david_b3 Posted December 16, 2002 Share Posted December 16, 2002 When developing black and white negs for diffusion and condenser enlargers one usually adjusts processing times accordingly � more (contrast) for diffusion, less (contrast) for a condenser. If I want to develop a perfect negative specifically tailored for a high end drum or Imacon scan should I try to produce a certain type of negative. My intuition says make it slightly thinner so it�s well below the dmax of the scanner. I�m sending the negs out to be scanned so I don�t have a lot of room for experimentation. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bernhard Posted December 16, 2002 Share Posted December 16, 2002 Despite your intuition, Paul Roark once said that he found it useful to develop to a HIGHER contrast, as long as the Dmax is well within the scanners range. As the scanners you mention have a very high Dmax this should be no problem and might have an advantage in tonality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
switchedcraigmageephotogra Posted December 17, 2002 Share Posted December 17, 2002 All the imacons i've used can handle b&w negs of highly varying contrast very well. I quite often have to scan dense over exposed negs, and get results that look like theres just a bit of over exposure. The imacons like the Precision and 848 seem to behave a lot like condenser enlargers, so you'll get sharper grain, so might want to dev your films as though they are to be printed on a condenser enlarger. The light source in the Imacon Photo is more diffuse.<p>So probably just dev them normally and aim for normal contrast, moving maybe towards a little lower contrast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruce watson Posted December 17, 2002 Share Posted December 17, 2002 Drum scanners in particular have a higher DMAX than you are likely able to produce with a B&W negative. What I do (and this may be considered sacrilige to some) is develop just about everything to N+1. I find I still end up increasing contrast in Photoshop with just about every negative. The difficulty isn't in seeing into the really dense areas of highlights on your film. If the detail is there, a drum scanner can get it. The problem is often not enough detail in the shadow areas. If there is no detail, there isn't a scanner made that can make it up as it scans... Moral of the story: Just like for paper prints, expose for the shadows and develop for the highlights. The only change is that a drum scanner can handle more density, so I feed it more contrasty negatives. More information is better than less, in this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now