zml Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 <p>The updater to DPP with DLO is available from Canon (I have D/Ld it from the Canon's Hong Kong site.) Also, fixes the "soft output" issue with 5D Mk. III files.<br> Lens profiles need to be downloaded from within the program and are very limited as of now. For instance there is no support for many Mk. I versions of the recently updated lenses, but the most popular lenses seem to be supported.<br> All I can say for now that DLO works but I haven't ran any meaningful tests.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cabbiinc Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 <p>Its also on the Canadian Canon site.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_dunn2 Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 <p>And now I see why you have to download your lens profiles. I picked the four lenses I currently own (three zooms and a prime), and it's download <b>90 MB</b> of profiles just for those lenses!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcstep Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 <p>There's lots of data in those files. The DOL adjusts several parameters for each zoom lens at every focal length and every aperture combination.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JosvanEekelen Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 <p>Support for cameras/lenses seems to be limited at the moment. Does anyone have an idea about the added benefits of DLO compared to lens corrections in Lightroom, Ufraw and the likes?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robin_sibson1 Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 <p>I started a thread on the effects of DLO a while back, based on tests with the version of DPP on the 25.0 CD (having dowloaded an ISO image of the disk that had been posted – I don't have a 5DIII yet), but the thread died , probably because not enough people had access to a DLO version of DPP at the time.</p> <p>Anyhow, the conclusions were that DLO did reveal additional detail, although I can't compare it to other RAW processors in that respect. However, on 7D files shot at ISO 1600, where a bit of luminance noise shows up, aggressive use of DLO made the noise much worse. That is still the case with DPP 3.11.26.0.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now