shaloot Posted December 9, 2010 Share Posted December 9, 2010 <p>Just curious if anyone has it and what they think of it. Or if you know of any good sites that have reviewed it? I noticed there's no photos from it in the PPG and the no one has reviewed the lens on adorama or BHphotovideo.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laur1 Posted December 9, 2010 Share Posted December 9, 2010 <p>It already has long threads with many samples on pentaxforums. As good and probably better than any review. If you're interested in this focal length, this is a great deal.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaloot Posted December 9, 2010 Author Share Posted December 9, 2010 <p>oh really? I haven't been on PF in ages, it just got out of control for me. But thanks for the info, will go check it out.</p> <p>And yes, I've been trying to convince my wife about it as well... her and Santa!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mountainvisions Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 <p>It looks like a good lens, but if I'm not mistaken it lacks distance scale and DOF scale, which is a shame.</p> <p>Still it might make a nice "faster" normal prime paired with either the WR kit or the new 18-135mm that looks nice as well.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremy_corbin Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 <p>I'm eyeballing this lens as well. Since I have the budget of a pauper, this lens would really fit the bill for my indoor work. I'm finding the M-40 to be sharp enough but a touch too long in my limited space, but a 50 on my ZX-M felt perfect. If this lens is 52mm(equiv) than I should be golden. The kit lens, while sharp enough, is just too slow to focus in low light.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laur1 Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 <p><a href="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/118765-da-35mm-2-4-plastic-wonder-dal35-vs-fa35-vs-da35m-vs-a35-many-photos.html">Here's the PF thread that I thought is as good as any review</a>. It compares the lens with other 35s.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mountainvisions Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 <p>It confirms what I've said all along, the FA 35mm is one of the best lenses Pentax made, and comparative to other brands it's an amazing lens wide open dollar for dollar against the competition. It holds it's own against the slower but newer DA 2.4, the fringing is greater, but really not extreme from the FA 35mm, looks like Lightroom would have no problem making both lenses pretty similar in that regard.</p> <p>I think with the distance scale issue, I'd opt for the FA 35mm or the DA Macro (which means I would get the DA Macro since I sold the FA35mm because of the plastic build!). However, for someone not really concerned with eithe Macro or the extra speed or (especially) the distance scales, the DA 35mm 2.4 looks like a great lens for the price.</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukhov Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 <p>To much for me, say around 100 bucks any color and free of shipping charges ! Sure thing nice to see some one try out ,like -3/4 sepia human image with manual set of focal on equal 50mm....</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaloot Posted December 12, 2010 Author Share Posted December 12, 2010 <p>Thanks for the link Laurentiu... the first part of the review was making my head hurt and I was about to quit reading it until I saw some actual photos! I'm really wanting this lens...</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now