raybrizzi Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 <p>Didn't see in the FAQ what the number ranges are from -x to +x. Thanks, Ray</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_daalder Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 <p><a href="../gallery/photocritique/standards/" target="blank">PN ratings</a></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iancoxleigh Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 <p>Peter, that page is not out of date. See this posting here: http://www.photo.net/site-help-forum/00XEWa . However, I think Ray is speaking about the new voting on the helpfulness of comments. </p> <p>Ray, there is has been a recent change to the just announced system and you will only be able to vote for helpful comments (no negative votes). I think the scale is simply endless within the approx/ six-month time-frame. So, your rating will go up one for one with each person who votes your comment as helpful. You can see more information and ask more directly here: http://www.photo.net/site-help-forum/00XFCT</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_j2 Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 <p>There is no "Originality" or "Aesthetics" in the current ratings, so the link that Peter provided is obsolete.</p> <p>Basically the ratings are from 1 to 7, 1 is bad, 7 is best.</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_j2 Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 <p>Ah, . . . The helpful ratings, . . . Sorry Ray, my comment is obsolete too!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raybrizzi Posted September 10, 2010 Author Share Posted September 10, 2010 <p>OK, Thanks, Jim. I had a -1 and wanted to know how low I could drop ;-)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 <p>Ray, your critiques tend to be succinct and personalized for each photograph with specific helpful notes regarding what works and what doesn't. Try adding a few more generic comments such as "Great capture!", "Well seen!" and "Congrats!" and your + rating will go up.</p> <p>Semi-seriously, the new system for indicating whether members find a critique helpful is so new the existing -/+ indicator isn't statistically significant yet. Wait awhile until folks use the option more often and yours should be well into the + range.</p> <p>Reminds me, I need to write more succinct critiques like yours. Takes me three paragraphs to say what you summarize in a single sentence.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raybrizzi Posted September 14, 2010 Author Share Posted September 14, 2010 <p>thx, lex!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
engela Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 <p>I have received a + voting for helpfulness, but is there a way that I can find out from who? It would be nice to know which comment was helpful, as I sometimes comment on various photos per day.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now