ernest-b Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 <p>"B." is a fine name. What's wrong with it?</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshroot Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 <blockquote> <p>BTW, I'm male. You've never seen a woman with a beard down to her waist.</p> </blockquote> <p>Maybe not where you live. But out here in the sticks....</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leighb Posted September 10, 2010 Author Share Posted September 10, 2010 <p>We "B."s must stick together. ;-)</p> <p>- Leigh</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leighb Posted September 10, 2010 Author Share Posted September 10, 2010 <blockquote> <p>Maybe not where you live. But out here in the sticks....</p> </blockquote> <p>Hi Josh,</p> <p>I know what you mean. ;-)</p> <p>- Leigh</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_h.1 Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 <blockquote> <p>John, I thought Stamoulis was being a bit sarcastic.</p> </blockquote> <p>I get it now.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordonjb Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 <p>To "B" or not to "B" this is the question.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ernest-b Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 <p>No, Gordon.</p> <p>To "B" or to "B." -- <em>that</em> is the question. Period.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bela_dick Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 <p>I thank photo.net for all the work they have put into creating this site. I have learned a lot from great photographers - and it is a lot of them here.<br> However, as long as the anonymous raters are not able to write despite the system enables them to do so (illiterate detractors maybe?) I must assume they enjoy making life unbearable for the lot of community members who really make hard work to advance to higher levels. I must start to questioning the anonymous rating at all.<br> I read a lot of people being criticized for giving statement such as "...I like it" or similar statements, or friendship 6 or 7`ratings. Think that is more tolerable than, becoming a 3 anonymously without a word which I see as a worst case situation for this site.<br> Why is an anonymous able to rate with 3 without giving a comment. Just as it is not possible to request critic without filling in a statement there should be attached a condition (such as giving a statement) to rate at all.<br> Giving critic without rating is OK. Rating without critic will never work. It will just outwear this great site over time.<br> Kind Regards<br> Bela Dick</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshroot Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 <blockquote> <p>Why is an anonymous able to rate with 3 without giving a comment. Just as it is not possible to request critic without filling in a statement there should be attached a condition (such as giving a statement) to rate at all.<br /> Giving critic without rating is OK. Rating without critic will never work. It will just outwear this great site over time.</p> </blockquote> <p>Well we've lasted a decade now without that requirement, so.....</p> <p>Seriously though. The ratings system and the critique systems are two different htings. One gets you a number, the other gets you words. If you want words, ask for words. If you want a number, ask for a number. Don't ask for one and then get disappointed if you don't get the other.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now