Jump to content

K7 loses big time


wayne_campbell

Recommended Posts

<p>Peter Bargh:<br>

Thanks for taking a stand-up approach on this. Too many web sites have sacrificed credibility in their product reviews and I appreciate the fact that you reacted quickly to pull a flawed review from your site.<br>

Good job.</p>

<p> </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote>

<p ><a name="00X9Ec"></a><a href="../photodb/user?user_id=2072536">Richard Harris</a> <a href="../member-status-icons"><img title="Frequent poster" src="http://static.photo.net/v3graphics/member-status-icons/1roll.gif" alt="" /></a>, Aug 25, 2010; 12:38 p.m.</p>

</blockquote>

 

<blockquote>

<p>Okay, okay, I understand that the review wasn't "fair" in most peoples eyes, but that is just what it is - a review. You have to take it for what it is, but I understand why it frustrates a few of you, don't worry..</p>

</blockquote>

 

Steve</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p><a href="../photodb/user?user_id=778231">Peter Bargh</a>, thanks for taking the time to reply to us who had issues with the test. I don't think you could do much more after publishing than pulling the test and explaining how it was bogus, but many eds wouldn't have, so cheers.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Glad to see the integrity of the publisher not compromised.<br>

It's one thing to have varying opinions, and even test on features that may favor one manufacturer. And a fact or two wrong can be corrected.<br>

But to commit so many errors, and clearly show no experience with a camera or attempt to read its manual to understand modes, now that's just totally going to destroy any comparison attempt.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...