JDMvW Posted April 24, 2010 Author Share Posted April 24, 2010 <p>And what are we thinking! Of course the Exakta had front releases back to before WWII. On the wrong side, of course (but if you're the <em>first</em>, who's to say it is <em>wrong</em>?). Only the last, the RTL 1000, went to the normal side but still had the normal (for Exakta) release too.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h._p. Posted April 24, 2010 Share Posted April 24, 2010 <p>OK, JDM, I'm now officially jealous of you. My first serious camera being a Pentacon FM, I've always wanted a Super. Unfortunately for me, with prices being the way they are, I can't imagine it ever happening. I hope you take it out regularly and feed it plenty of film. It's a camera that deserves to be used.</p> <p>And, of course, it has that marvellous 45 degree release!</p> <p>:-)))</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan_ginman Posted April 29, 2010 Share Posted April 29, 2010 "The most important feature of the Nova and later models, it seems to me, is the angled release button, inherited from the Contax S and its Pentacon successors. I feel certain that it's worth at least one and possibly, two stops of extra steadiness." Interestingly enough, I found the opposite. I used to own a LTM (?) The one where you pushed a big black button on the front to activate the light meter. The fact that I had to push the shutter at an angle to the other forces on the camera (gravity, me holding it against gravity, me pushing it into my face) meant that I induced more camera shake than with a conventional vertical shutter release. That combined with the fact that you had to push the light meter button in another direction was all too much for me. Cheers Alan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephen_lumsden Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 The L2 does not get the justice it deserves. I am not crazy about the shutter button location myself or the really loud mirror slap. It does lack finesse also, but is reliable with a good viewfinder and delivers consistently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Farrell Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 It's good to see a thread about Prakticas resurrected...my only camera for many years was a Praktica LLC, which I bought new in 1973. The meter died after a few years, but I just used a handheld meter. I haven't used the LLC in the last few years, but it still works fine. I have, though, aquired another dozen or so L series Prakticas, of different models. Some, I have repaired. Two of the cameras had shutter cocking problems - one caused by battery leakage, and the other being worn out. Another had a shutter problem caused by grease on the mechanism; I cleaned the parts, and fixed it. There are some odd ideas about Praktica L cameras out there. One "critic" was complaining about plastic gears...I don't know where he found them, the only plastic gears I've found in these cameras are in the meter mechanism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now