expfc_wintergreen Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 <p>Anyone tried MPI or NCPS for developing and scanning of C41, E6, and conventional black and white film?<br> I am mostly interested in how their scans compare to scans from a Nikon CS 9000 and the quality of their development of Tri-X and other black and white films. I shoot 35 mm.<br> I have been trying to decide whether to save for a Nikon Cool Scan 9000 or a Nikon D700. If I can get very good scans from MPI or NCPS at a reasonable price, I will buy the D700; if not, I will probably bite the bullet and buy the Cool Scan and wait for a digital full frame until the prices come down.<br> MPI is local to me, and NCPS will require mail which will add to the time and the price.</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tim gray Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 <p>I've not heard of MPI. I've seen NCPS scans and they seem worth the $5 for me. Not at the level of a 9000, and certainly grainier than the D700, but still good. I've also talked to some people that say dont go for the enhanced scans, go for the 'budget' scans, which are a lot cheaper ($5), but still pretty big, like 2000x3000.</p> <p>The scans look good for minilab-type scans. The grain is a bit accented. For $5, I'd happily use them for 99% of my uses, small prints, internet, etc. For large prints I'd make from my negatives, I would rescan ONLY those frames at home or at a professional lab.</p> <p>I'm getting an order together to send to them. I can't comment on their B&W development - I do mine at home.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
expfc_wintergreen Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 <p>Thank you for the response.<br> I was hoping the enhanced scan from NCPS or the standard scans from MPI would be good for 4X6, 8X12, and 12X18 if I did my part correctly.<br> I will try a roll at each place and see what happens.<br> Thanks again.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randyhargraves Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 <p>Never used the Memphis lab but I've had NCPS do several 35mm and 120 E-6 process & scan jobs. I've always been very pleased with the "enhanced scan" I get even for 35mm. I've got an epson v500 and it can't hold a candle to the detail and cleanness I get back from NCPS. Check out my gallery to see some examples. </p> <p>I've seen some comparisons on flickr of the Coolscan and the NCPS scan and they were very comparable. The CS did a little better job pulling out shadow detail from the velvia slide, although honestly I've never spent much time in photoshop to see how much shadow detail I could wrangle from the NCPS scan. Personally I would send off the E-6 and purchase the D700. Mainly because scanning film is not very much fun but shooting with a d700 would be. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
expfc_wintergreen Posted February 24, 2010 Author Share Posted February 24, 2010 <p>Thanks for your response. It was really what I wanted to read.<br> Good point about it being more fun to take pictures than to scan.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
photic Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 <p>Much thanks for the feedback on NCPS. I was considering having my scans done locally, but the North Coast budget scans are so much less expensive :)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now